EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hongbo Co vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hongbo Co (002229) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Hongbo Co trades at ¥11.14 versus a fair value of ¥2.48 (-78%), while Cintas trades at $192 versus $181 (-6%).
Hongbo Co
002229.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥11.14
Fair Value¥2.48
Quality54/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$192
Fair Value$181
Quality78/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Hongbo CoCintas
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)39.1×
2.25×P/S (TTM)6.92×
0.87×P/B15.17×
n/aEV/EBITDA25.6×
n/aPEG3.06×
−77.7%Fair value upside−5.6%
0.4%Dividend yield0.9%
n/aDividend per share$1.74
Profitability
-33%Operating margin24%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.18×
-20%Return on equity41%
-5%Return on assets16%
Growth
-87%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
22.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
16.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
n/aValue creation/yr+14.7%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)24.5×
0.01×Debt / equity0.47×
$956MMarket cap$78B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hongbo Coof which business quality 53 · market factors 21 Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
9
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
75
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
10
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
84
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
99
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
9
50
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
7
41
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
78
90

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyHongbo CoPrice ¥11.14CintasPrice $192
DCF Modelsn/a-49%below the price$98.61
Earnings-Basedn/a-75%below the price$48.67
Dividend Discount-94%below the price¥0.64-84%below the price$30.85
Multiples-74%below the price¥2.91-60%below the price$76.91
Asset-Based-87%below the price¥1.49-96%below the price$8.61
Growth DCFn/a-60%below the price$76.96
Economic Profitn/a-69%below the price$58.94
Growth Earningsn/a-58%below the price$81.35
Minimum-94%below the price¥0.64-96%below the price$8.61
Maximum-74%below the price¥2.91-49%below the price$98.61
Median-87%below the price¥1.49-65%below the price$67.92
Geometric mean-87%below the price¥1.41-74%below the price$49.52

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Hongbo Co: 4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Cintas: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Hongbo Co
Price ¥11.14
Fair Value ¥2.48
Bear ¥1.99Bull ¥2.98
Cintas
Price $192
Fair Value $181
Bear $114Bull $299

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hongbo Co · Industrials

Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Hongbo Co trades at ¥11.14 versus a fair value of ¥2.48 (-78%), while Cintas trades at $192 versus $181 (-6%).

Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).

Open Cintas live analysis →
Hongbo Co · Cintas

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Hongbo Co

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Cintas

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.