EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Samsung Electronics Co vs Mirgor S.A.: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Samsung Electronics Co (005930) and Mirgor S.A. (MIRG) compare, as of Oct 3, 2026.

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mirgor S.A. as the less overvalued of the two: Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 276,000 versus a fair value of KRW 162,073 (−41.3%), while Mirgor S.A. trades at ARS 1,675 versus ARS 1,307 (−21.9%).
Samsung Electronics Co
005930.KO · KRW · Information Technology
−41.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 276,000
Fair ValueKRW 162,073
Quality71/100
Mirgor S.A.
MIRG.BA · ARS · Consumer Discretionary
−21.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceARS 1,675
Fair ValueARS 1,307
Quality27/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Samsung Electronics CoMirgor S.A.
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)144.9×
3.9×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
15.6×Median P/E at FY-end (8 FY, ex one-offs where documented)n/a
0.13×PEGn/a
−41.3%Fair value upside−21.9%
0.5%Dividend yieldn/a
KRW 1,496Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
52.2%Operating margin-8.9%
0.86×EBIT margin trend (5Y)5.55×
30.8%Return on equity8.4%
17.7%Return on assets7.1%
Growth
130.0%Revenue growth (YoY)-2.1%
3.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)93.4%
7.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)99.6%
+12.0%Value creation/yr−27.3%
Balance & size
72.0×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)3.0×
0.01×Debt / equity0.06×
$1.4TMarket capn/a
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive
Samsung Electronics Co, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 8 fiscal years (2018 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2025 ex one-offs: 15.6.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Samsung Electronics Co leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Samsung Electronics Coof which business quality 67 · market factors 60 Mirgor S.A.of which business quality 29 · market factors 15
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
48
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
68
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
60
3
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
86
37
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
49
29
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
10
50
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
78
0
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
85
0
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
92
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familySamsung Electronics CoPrice KRW 276,000Mirgor S.A.Price ARS 1,675
DCF Models−39.9%below the priceKRW 165,947n/a
Earnings-Based−73.7%below the priceKRW 72,540+72.0%above the priceARS 2,881
Dividend Discount−88.3%below the priceKRW 32,330n/a
Multiples−41.7%below the priceKRW 160,812+490.7%above the priceARS 9,895
Asset-Based−82.1%below the priceKRW 49,320−10.4%close to the priceARS 1,501
Growth DCF−56.4%below the priceKRW 120,435n/a
Economic Profit−68.2%below the priceKRW 87,675+512.8%above the priceARS 10,264
Growth Earnings−31.6%below the priceKRW 188,865+93.9%above the priceARS 3,248
Minimum−88.3%below the priceKRW 32,330−10.4%close to the priceARS 1,501
Maximum−31.6%below the priceKRW 188,865+512.8%above the priceARS 10,264
Median−62.3%below the priceKRW 104,055+93.9%above the priceARS 3,248
Geometric mean−65.9%below the priceKRW 94,115+155.2%above the priceARS 4,274

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Samsung Electronics Co: 24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Mirgor S.A.: 5 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Samsung Electronics Co
Price KRW 276,000
Fair Value KRW 162,073
Bear KRW 99,239Bull KRW 232,887
Mirgor S.A.
Price ARS 1,675
Fair Value ARS 1,307
Bear ARS 981Bull ARS 1,634

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Samsung Electronics Co · Information Technology

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−41.3% · below median

Mirgor S.A. · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score27 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−21.9% · below median

Bottom line

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mirgor S.A. as the less overvalued of the two: Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 276,000 versus a fair value of KRW 162,073 (−41.3%), while Mirgor S.A. trades at ARS 1,675 versus ARS 1,307 (−21.9%).

Samsung Electronics Co has the higher quality score (71/100).

Open Mirgor S.A. live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.