EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Wanjia Group Holdings vs McKesson: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Wanjia Group Holdings (0401) and McKesson (MCK) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McKesson as the less overvalued of the two: Wanjia Group Holdings trades at HK$0.13 versus a fair value of HK$0.06 (-54%), while McKesson trades at $869 versus $819 (-6%).
Wanjia Group Holdings
0401.HK · HKD · Health Care
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.13
Fair ValueHK$0.06
Quality61/100
McKesson
MCK · USD · Health Care
-6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$869
Fair Value$819
Quality66/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Wanjia Group HoldingsMcKesson
Valuation
P/E (TTM)21.0×
0.11×P/S (TTM)0.23×
0.27×P/B
EV/EBITDA13.9×
PEG1.57×
Dividend yield0.4%
Dividend per share$3.17
Profitability
-5%Net margin1%
1%Operating margin2%
-12%Return on equity
-3%Return on assets5%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
1.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)13.4%
10.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.1%
Balance & size
$18MMarket cap$94B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

McKesson leads: 1 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Wanjia Group Holdingsof which business quality 63 · market factors 56 McKessonof which business quality 65 · market factors 67
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
37
49
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
59
65
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
56
47
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
68
72
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
18
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
71
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
75
67
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Wanjia Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$0.10
MultiplesHK$0.11
Asset-BasedHK$0.04
Growth DCFHK$0.11

10 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

McKesson

DCF Models$955
Earnings-Based$444
Dividend Discount$57.26
Multiples$848
Growth DCF$922
Economic Profit$497
Growth Earnings$708

13 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Wanjia Group Holdings
Bear HK$0.05Fair Value HK$0.06Bull HK$0.07
HK$0.13 = current price (white tick)
McKesson
Bear $605Fair Value $819Bull $1,034
$869 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Wanjia Group Holdings · Health Care

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-54% · below median

McKesson · Health Care

Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McKesson as the less overvalued of the two: Wanjia Group Holdings trades at HK$0.13 versus a fair value of HK$0.06 (-54%), while McKesson trades at $869 versus $819 (-6%).

McKesson has the higher quality score (66/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.