EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sungho Electronics vs NIBE Industrier AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sungho Electronics (043260) and NIBE Industrier AB (publ) (NIBE-B) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NIBE Industrier AB (publ) as the more attractively valued of the two: Sungho Electronics trades at KRW 17,210 versus a fair value of KRW 9,016 (-48%), while NIBE Industrier AB (publ) trades at SEK 40.14 versus SEK 40.43 (+1%).
Sungho Electronics
043260.KQ · KRW · Information Technology
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 17,210
Fair ValueKRW 9,016
Quality37/100
NIBE Industrier AB (publ)
NIBE-B.ST · SEK · Industrials
+1%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceSEK 40.14
Fair ValueSEK 40.43
Quality58/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sungho ElectronicsNIBE Industrier AB (publ)
Valuation
P/E (TTM)29.9×
P/S (TTM)1.76×
P/B2.37×
EV/EBITDA15.7×
PEG1.79×
Dividend yield1.0%
Dividend per shareSEK 0.35
Profitability
-4%Net margin6%
-1%Operating margin9%
330%Return on equity8%
-1%Return on assets4%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)-0%
14.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
16.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.5%
Balance & size
0.11×Debt / equity0.53×
$885MMarket cap$8B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Sungho Electronics leads: 5 to 3 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sungho Electronicsof which business quality 42 · market factors 48 NIBE Industrier AB (publ)of which business quality 56 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
65
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
56
65
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
37
51
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
49
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
66
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
20
55
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
58
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
64
40
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sungho Electronics

DCF ModelsKRW 4,315
Earnings-BasedKRW 11,594
Dividend DiscountKRW 110
MultiplesKRW 5,646
Asset-BasedKRW 2,369
Growth DCFKRW 3,547
Economic ProfitKRW 10,641
Growth EarningsKRW 20,463

19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

NIBE Industrier AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 37.40
Earnings-BasedSEK 15.96
Dividend DiscountSEK 5.98
MultiplesSEK 24.27
Asset-BasedSEK 11.37
Growth DCFSEK 45.05
Economic ProfitSEK 12.91
Growth EarningsSEK 24.90

20 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sungho Electronics
Bear KRW 6,762Fair Value KRW 9,016Bull KRW 11,271
KRW 17,210 = current price (white tick)
NIBE Industrier AB (publ)
Bear SEK 26.52Fair Value SEK 40.43Bull SEK 53.42
SEK 40.14 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sungho Electronics · Information Technology

Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-48% · below median

NIBE Industrier AB (publ) · Industrials

Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside+1% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NIBE Industrier AB (publ) as the more attractively valued of the two: Sungho Electronics trades at KRW 17,210 versus a fair value of KRW 9,016 (-48%), while NIBE Industrier AB (publ) trades at SEK 40.14 versus SEK 40.43 (+1%).

NIBE Industrier AB (publ) has the higher quality score (58/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.