EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Joycity vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Joycity (067000) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Joycity trades at KRW 1,227 versus a fair value of KRW 551 (-55%), while NetEase trades at $133 versus $172 (+29%).
Joycity
067000.KQ · KRW · Communication Services
-55%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 1,227
Fair ValueKRW 551
Quality44/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+29%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$133
Fair Value$172
Quality81/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

JoycityNetEase
Valuation
P/E (TTM)16.9×
P/S (TTM)4.99×
P/B3.56×
7.0×EV/EBITDA12.9×
PEG1.45×
Dividend yield2.3%
Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
-7%Net margin30%
1%Operating margin41%
-12%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets11%
Growth
29%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-5.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
-3.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
0.69×Debt / equity0.00×
$53MMarket cap$85B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

NetEase leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Joycityof which business quality 40 · market factors 16 NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
30
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
41
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
7
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
26
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
47
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
51
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
7
47
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
78
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Joycity

Earnings-BasedKRW 184
Dividend DiscountKRW 254
MultiplesKRW 696
Asset-BasedKRW 831
Economic ProfitKRW 184

8 of 8 models see the stock below the current price.

NetEase

DCF Models$1,933
Earnings-Based$1,295
Dividend Discount$369
Multiples$834
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,771
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,701

0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Joycity
Bear KRW 136Fair Value KRW 551Bull KRW 551
KRW 1,227 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $129Fair Value $172Bull $282
$133 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Joycity · Communication Services

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-55% · bottom 25%

NetEase · Communication Services

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+29% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Joycity trades at KRW 1,227 versus a fair value of KRW 551 (-55%), while NetEase trades at $133 versus $172 (+29%).

NetEase has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.