STOCK COMPARISON
Wonik QnC vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Wonik QnC (074600) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Wonik QnC as the less overvalued of the two: Wonik QnC trades at KRW 27,700 versus a fair value of KRW 17,763 (-36%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,499 versus €444 (-70%).
Wonik QnC
074600.KQ · KRW · Information Technology
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 27,700
Fair ValueKRW 17,763
Quality46/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,499
Fair Value€444
Quality82/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Wonik QnCASML Holding
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)60.6×
—P/S (TTM)19.32×
—P/B34.80×
3.5×EV/EBITDA49.9×
—PEG2.19×
0.5%Dividend yield0.3%
KRW 130Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
2%Net margin30%
9%Operating margin37%
—Return on equity54%
2%Return on assets16%
Growth
11%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
6.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
12.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
1.13×Debt / equity0.14×
$534MMarket cap$683B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
ASML Holding leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Wonik QnCof which business quality 45 · market factors 48
ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
29
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
39
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
40
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
25
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
54
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
64
90
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
92
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Wonik QnC
Earnings-BasedKRW 12,880
Dividend DiscountKRW 1,910
MultiplesKRW 15,833
Asset-BasedKRW 12,411
Economic ProfitKRW 14,281
Growth EarningsKRW 18,954
12 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.
ASML Holding
DCF Models€708
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€342
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€664
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€570
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Wonik QnC
Bear KRW 13,323Fair Value KRW 17,763Bull KRW 26,123
KRW 27,700 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €339Fair Value €444Bull €740
€1,499 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Wonik QnC · Information Technology
Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside-36% · above median
ASML Holding · Information Technology
Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Wonik QnC as the less overvalued of the two: Wonik QnC trades at KRW 27,700 versus a fair value of KRW 17,763 (-36%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,499 versus €444 (-70%).
ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
