EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Gabia vs Kinx: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Gabia (079940) and Kinx (093320) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Gabia as the less overvalued of the two: Gabia trades at KRW 45,500 versus a fair value of KRW 24,232 (-47%), while Kinx trades at KRW 149,300 versus KRW 74,800 (-50%).
Gabia
079940.KQ · KRW · Information Technology
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 45,500
Fair ValueKRW 24,232
Quality52/100
Kinx
093320.KQ · KRW · Communication Services
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 149,300
Fair ValueKRW 74,800
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

GabiaKinx
Valuation
1.0×EV/EBITDA1.0×
0.3%Dividend yield0.6%
Profitability
8%Net margin23%
17%Operating margin25%
8%Return on assets10%
Growth
11%Revenue growth (YoY)24%
12.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.8%
14.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.7%
Balance & size
0.66×Debt / equity0.30×
$310MMarket cap$426M
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Kinx leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Gabiaof which business quality 52 · market factors 76 Kinxof which business quality 60 · market factors 78
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
37
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
63
55
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
55
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
55
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
24
24
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
39
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
86
78
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
100
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
80
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Gabia

DCF ModelsKRW 48,487
Earnings-BasedKRW 21,468
MultiplesKRW 30,282
Asset-BasedKRW 9,093
Growth DCFKRW 48,425
Economic ProfitKRW 25,410
Growth EarningsKRW 24,886

15 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Kinx

DCF ModelsKRW 114,435
Earnings-BasedKRW 56,873
MultiplesKRW 69,503
Asset-BasedKRW 30,055
Growth DCFKRW 114,014
Economic ProfitKRW 40,654
Growth EarningsKRW 87,427

22 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Gabia
Bear KRW 18,174Fair Value KRW 24,232Bull KRW 30,290
KRW 45,500 = current price (white tick)
Kinx
Bear KRW 53,790Fair Value KRW 74,800Bull KRW 95,810
KRW 149,300 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Gabia · Information Technology

Quality score52 · below median
Fair value upside-47% · below median

Kinx · Communication Services

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Gabia as the less overvalued of the two: Gabia trades at KRW 45,500 versus a fair value of KRW 24,232 (-47%), while Kinx trades at KRW 149,300 versus KRW 74,800 (-50%).

Kinx has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.