TES vs TSE: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how TES (095610) and TSE (131290) compare, as of Oct 30, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
TES leads: 9 to 5 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | TESPrice KRW 108,500 | TSEPrice KRW 222,000 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▼−42.0%below the priceKRW 62,950 | n/a |
| Earnings-Based | ▼−39.6%below the priceKRW 65,569 | ▼−80.0%below the priceKRW 44,500 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼−94.2%below the priceKRW 6,332 | ▼−97.9%below the priceKRW 4,734 |
| Multiples | ▼−42.2%below the priceKRW 62,764 | ▼−50.5%below the priceKRW 109,820 |
| Asset-Based | ▼−94.4%below the priceKRW 6,053 | ▼−95.9%below the priceKRW 9,195 |
| Growth DCF | ▼−53.8%below the priceKRW 50,108 | n/a |
| Economic Profit | ▼−80.9%below the priceKRW 20,765 | ▼−86.4%below the priceKRW 30,111 |
| Growth Earnings | ●−9.6%close to the priceKRW 98,083 | ▼−62.2%below the priceKRW 83,925 |
| Matching families | 6 of 8 | |
| Minimum | ▼−94.4%below the priceKRW 6,053 | ▼−97.9%below the priceKRW 4,734 |
| Maximum | ●−9.6%close to the priceKRW 98,083 | ▼−50.5%below the priceKRW 109,820 |
| Median | ▼−61.5%below the priceKRW 41,765 | ▼−83.2%below the priceKRW 37,305 |
| Geometric mean | ▼−75.9%below the priceKRW 26,170 | ▼−87.2%below the priceKRW 28,514 |
| Ahead family by family | 6 of 6 | 0 of 6 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean only use the families both stocks have (matching families: 6 of 8), so a family without a value on one side does not distort the comparison. Ahead in a family is the stock whose fair value there sits higher relative to its price. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Family by family: TES is ahead in 6 of 6 shared families, TSE in none.
TES: 24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
TSE: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
TES · Information Technology
TSE · Information Technology
Bottom line
As of Oct 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees TES as the more attractively valued of the two: TES trades at KRW 108,500 versus a fair value of KRW 119,350 (+10.0%), while TSE trades at KRW 222,000 versus KRW 83,925 (−62.2%).
TES has the higher quality score (68/100).
Open TES live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.