EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tibet Water Resources vs Anheuser Busch Inbev SA: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tibet Water Resources (1115) and Anheuser Busch Inbev SA (ABI) compare, as of Sep 30, 2026.

As of Sep 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Anheuser Busch Inbev SA as the less overvalued of the two: Tibet Water Resources trades at HK$0.54 versus a fair value of HK$0.20 (−61.9%), while Anheuser Busch Inbev SA trades at €65.32 versus €60.78 (−7.0%).
Tibet Water Resources
1115.HK · HKD · Consumer Staples
−61.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.54
Fair ValueHK$0.20
Quality61/100
Anheuser Busch Inbev SA
ABI.BR · EUR · Consumer Staples
−7.0%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price€65.32
Fair Value€60.78
Quality60/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Tibet Water ResourcesAnheuser Busch Inbev SA
Valuation
20.3×P/E (TTM)16.9×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)14.9×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)25.0×
6.19×P/S (TTM)2.34×
0.77×P/B1.68× · book value is mostly goodwill
20.5×EV/EBITDA10.5×
n/aPEG1.59×
−61.9%Fair value upside−7.0%
n/aDividend yield1.8%
n/aDividend per share€1.15
Profitability
21.2%Operating margin27.3%
1.70×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.29×
3.3%Return on equity11.4%
1.4%Return on assets4.9%
Growth
117.7%Revenue growth (YoY)11.0%
4.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.9%
-6.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.8%
+6.7%Value creation/yr+9.8%
Balance & size
2.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)3.9×
0.04×Debt / equity0.83×
$331MMarket cap$147B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Anheuser Busch Inbev SA, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2020, FY2021 ex one-offs: 25.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Anheuser Busch Inbev SA leads: 3 to 10 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tibet Water Resourcesof which business quality 58 · market factors 44 Anheuser Busch Inbev SAof which business quality 58 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
32
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
93
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
81
85
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
56
35
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
80
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
48
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
43
53
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
65
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
87

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyTibet Water ResourcesPrice HK$0.54Anheuser Busch Inbev SAPrice €65.32
DCF Models−52.3%below the priceHK$0.26+1.1%close to the price€66.05
Earnings-Based−72.0%below the priceHK$0.15−36.8%below the price€41.27
Multiples−38.3%below the priceHK$0.330%close to the price€65.60
Asset-Based−23.4%below the priceHK$0.41−54.8%below the price€29.53
Growth DCF−62.6%below the priceHK$0.20−1.7%close to the price€64.18
Economic Profit−49.5%below the priceHK$0.27−38.4%below the price€40.24
Growth Earnings−45.8%below the priceHK$0.29−6.8%close to the price€60.88
Minimum−72.0%below the priceHK$0.15−54.8%below the price€29.53
Maximum−23.4%below the priceHK$0.41+1.1%close to the price€66.05
Median−49.5%below the priceHK$0.27−6.8%close to the price€60.88
Geometric mean−51.3%below the priceHK$0.26−22.8%below the price€50.44

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Tibet Water Resources: 22 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Anheuser Busch Inbev SA: 15 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Tibet Water Resources
Price HK$0.54
Fair Value HK$0.20
Bear HK$0.15Bull HK$0.26
Anheuser Busch Inbev SA
Price €65.32
Fair Value €60.78
Bear €42.37Bull €88.82

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tibet Water Resources · Consumer Staples

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside−61.9% · bottom 25%

Anheuser Busch Inbev SA · Consumer Staples

Quality score60 · above median
Fair value upside−7.0% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Anheuser Busch Inbev SA as the less overvalued of the two: Tibet Water Resources trades at HK$0.54 versus a fair value of HK$0.20 (−61.9%), while Anheuser Busch Inbev SA trades at €65.32 versus €60.78 (−7.0%).

Tibet Water Resources has the higher quality score (61/100).

Open Anheuser Busch Inbev SA live analysis →
Tibet Water Resources · Anheuser Busch Inbev SA

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Tibet Water Resources

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Anheuser Busch Inbev SA

Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron Technology
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.