EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Li Peng Enterprise Co vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Li Peng Enterprise Co (1447) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Li Peng Enterprise Co trades at TWD 6.89 versus a fair value of TWD 3.42 (-50%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.48 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).
Li Peng Enterprise Co
1447.TW · TWD · Consumer Discretionary
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 6.89
Fair ValueTWD 3.42
Quality42/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+65%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$41.48
Fair ValueHK$68.24
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Li Peng Enterprise CoShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
P/E (TTM)9.9×
P/S (TTM)2.15×
P/B1.78×
3.7×EV/EBITDA7.2×
0.92×PEG0.88×
3.2%Dividend yield5.2%
Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
-3%Net margin19%
1%Operating margin18%
-8%Return on equity16%
-1%Return on assets7%
Growth
16%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
-0.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
15.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.22×Debt / equity0.01×
$205MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Li Peng Enterprise Coof which business quality 41 · market factors 66 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
13
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
7
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
55
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
69
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
78
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
42
9
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Li Peng Enterprise Co

Dividend DiscountTWD 2.87
MultiplesTWD 0.72
Asset-BasedTWD 5.96

4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

5 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Li Peng Enterprise Co
Bear TWD 1.81Fair Value TWD 3.42Bull TWD 5.68
TWD 6.89 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$45.16Fair Value HK$68.24Bull HK$85.21
HK$41.48 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Li Peng Enterprise Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score42 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-50% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+65% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Li Peng Enterprise Co trades at TWD 6.89 versus a fair value of TWD 3.42 (-50%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.48 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.