EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) (1471) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) as the less overvalued of the two: Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) trades at HK$7.91 versus a fair value of HK$6.59 (-17%), while Marsh & McLennan Companies trades at $192 versus $112 (-41%).
Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao)
1471.HK · HKD · Information Technology
-17%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$7.91
Fair ValueHK$6.59
Quality64/100
Marsh & McLennan Companies
MRSH · USD · Financials
-41%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$192
Fair Value$112
Quality64/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao)Marsh & McLennan Companies
Valuation
24.2×P/E (TTM)22.8×
5.92×P/S (TTM)3.19×
2.32×P/B5.81×
20.3×EV/EBITDA13.6×
PEG1.76×
1.5%Dividend yield2.0%
HK$0.16Dividend per share$3.60
Profitability
21%Net margin14%
23%Operating margin24%
9%Return on equity28%
4%Return on assets7%
Growth
15%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
18.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)9.2%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.4%
Balance & size
Debt / equity1.21×
$187MMarket cap$88B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Marsh & McLennan Companies leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao)of which business quality 66 · market factors 3 Marsh & McLennan Companiesof which business quality 60 · market factors 57
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
50
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
95
75
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
97
35
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
62
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
7
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
48
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
93

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao)

MultiplesHK$5.15
Asset-BasedHK$2.28
Economic ProfitHK$2.81

4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Marsh & McLennan Companies

Dividend Discount$60.10
Multiples$78.07
Asset-Based$21.00
Economic Profit$74.16

6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao)
Bear HK$4.94Fair Value HK$6.59Bull HK$8.23
HK$7.91 = current price (white tick)
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Bear $84.19Fair Value $112Bull $140
$192 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) · Information Technology

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-17% · above median

Marsh & McLennan Companies · Financials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-41% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) as the less overvalued of the two: Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) trades at HK$7.91 versus a fair value of HK$6.59 (-17%), while Marsh & McLennan Companies trades at $192 versus $112 (-41%).

Zhongmiao Hldg (Qingdao) has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.