Boer Power Holdings vs WW Grainger: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Boer Power Holdings (1685) and WW Grainger (GWW) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Boer Power Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Boer Power Holdings trades at HK$0.67 versus a fair value of HK$0.57 (-14%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,323 versus $614 (-54%).
Boer Power Holdings
1685.HK · HKD · Industrials
-14%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.67
Fair ValueHK$0.57
Quality54/100
WW Grainger
GWW · USD · Industrials
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,323
Fair Value$614
Quality71/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Boer Power HoldingsWW Grainger
Valuation
30.7×P/E (TTM)37.0×
1.10×P/S (TTM)3.53×
2.38×P/B15.69×
3.6×EV/EBITDA21.6×
—PEG2.15×
0.8%Dividend yield0.7%
HK$0.01Dividend per share$9.04
Profitability
3%Net margin10%
6%Operating margin17%
6%Return on equity46%
1%Return on assets20%
Growth
-17%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
1.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.6%
-4.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.57×
$91MMarket cap$65B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
WW Grainger leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Boer Power Holdingsof which business quality 54 · market factors 62WW Graingerof which business quality 68 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
25
89
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
92
55
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
4
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
92
65
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
75
79
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Boer Power Holdings
DCF ModelsHK$1.87
Earnings-BasedHK$0.41
Dividend DiscountHK$0.27
MultiplesHK$0.95
Asset-BasedHK$0.26
Growth DCFHK$2.10
Economic ProfitHK$0.73
Growth EarningsHK$0.41
10 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
WW Grainger
DCF Models$615
Earnings-Based$340
Dividend Discount$169
Multiples$703
Asset-Based$58.76
Growth DCF$540
Economic Profit$467
Growth Earnings$668
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Boer Power Holdings
Bear HK$0.43Fair Value HK$0.57Bull HK$0.71
HK$0.67 = current price (white tick)
WW Grainger
Bear $361Fair Value $614Bull $949
$1,323 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Boer Power Holdings · Industrials
Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-14% · above median
WW Grainger · Industrials
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Boer Power Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Boer Power Holdings trades at HK$0.67 versus a fair value of HK$0.57 (-14%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,323 versus $614 (-54%).
WW Grainger has the higher quality score (71/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.