EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Mao Bao vs EssilorLuxottica S. A.: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mao Bao (1732) and EssilorLuxottica S. A. (EL) compare, as of Sep 10, 2026.

As of Sep 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees EssilorLuxottica S. A. as the less overvalued of the two: Mao Bao trades at TWD 26.05 versus a fair value of TWD 14.51 (-44%), while EssilorLuxottica S. A. trades at €149 versus €94.93 (-36%).
Mao Bao
1732.TW · TWD · Consumer Staples
-44%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 26.05
Fair ValueTWD 14.51
Quality75/100
EssilorLuxottica S. A.
EL.PA · EUR · Health Care
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€149
Fair Value€94.93
Quality63/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Mao BaoEssilorLuxottica S. A.
Valuation
37.9×P/E (TTM)29.4×
1.63×P/S (TTM)3.21×
2.23×P/B2.35×
13.8×EV/EBITDA17.0×
—PEG1.65×
−44.3%Fair value upside−36.3%
2.3%Dividend yield2.7%
TWD 0.60Dividend per share€4.00
Profitability
8%Operating margin10%
0.89×EBIT margin trend (5Y)2.36×
8%Return on equity6%
5%Return on assets3%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
4.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.2%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.6%
+5.6%Value creation/yr+18.0%
Balance & size
210.1×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)14.1×
—Debt / equity0.18×
$35MMarket cap$92B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

EssilorLuxottica S. A. leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Mao Baoof which business quality 74 · market factors 46 EssilorLuxottica S. A.of which business quality 63 · market factors 28
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
50
37
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
73
42
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
55
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
75
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
89
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
88
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
10
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
17
0
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
83
70

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyMao BaoPrice TWD 26.05EssilorLuxottica S. A.Price €149
DCF Models-38%below the priceTWD 16.19+10%close to the price€163
Earnings-Based-66%below the priceTWD 8.99-60%below the price€59.74
Dividend Discount-82%below the priceTWD 4.61-86%below the price€20.94
Multiples-37%below the priceTWD 16.54-33%below the price€99.39
Asset-Based-70%below the priceTWD 7.94-62%below the price€56.69
Growth DCF-40%below the priceTWD 15.66+1%close to the price€150
Economic Profit-62%below the priceTWD 9.94-58%below the price€62.21
Growth Earnings-58%below the priceTWD 10.98-34%below the price€97.85
Minimum-82%below the priceTWD 4.61-86%below the price€20.94
Maximum-37%below the priceTWD 16.54+10%close to the price€163
Median-60%below the priceTWD 10.46-46%below the price€80.03
Geometric mean-60%below the priceTWD 10.52-49%below the price€75.48

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Mao Bao: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

EssilorLuxottica S. A.: 19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Mao Bao
Bear TWD 10.88Fair Value TWD 14.51Bull TWD 18.14
TWD 26.05 = current price (white tick)
EssilorLuxottica S. A.
Bear €67.19Fair Value €94.93Bull €126
€149 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Mao Bao · Consumer Staples

Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-44% · bottom 25%

EssilorLuxottica S. A. · Health Care

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees EssilorLuxottica S. A. as the less overvalued of the two: Mao Bao trades at TWD 26.05 versus a fair value of TWD 14.51 (-44%), while EssilorLuxottica S. A. trades at €149 versus €94.93 (-36%).

Mao Bao has the higher quality score (75/100).

See the full analysis →
Mao Bao · EssilorLuxottica S. A.

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Mao Bao

British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs WalmartAltria vs WalmartBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Costco WholesaleCostco Wholesale vs Altria

Related to EssilorLuxottica S. A.

Eli Lilly and vs UnitedHealth GroupJohnson & Johnson vs UnitedHealth GroupAbbVie vs UnitedHealth GroupMerck & Company vs UnitedHealth Group
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.