EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Yageo vs Amphenol: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Yageo (2327) and Amphenol (APH) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the more attractively valued of the two: Yageo trades at TWD 545 versus a fair value of TWD 289 (-47%), while Amphenol trades at $82.07 versus $97.19 (+18%).
Yageo
2327.TW · TWD · Information Technology
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 545
Fair ValueTWD 289
Quality65/100
Amphenol
APH · USD · Information Technology
+18%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$82.07
Fair Value$97.19
Quality68/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

YageoAmphenol
Valuation
62.9×P/E (TTM)24.3×
11.41×P/S (TTM)7.18×
9.35×P/B13.87×
36.9×EV/EBITDA23.2×
1.56×PEG1.29×
−46.9%Fair value upside+18.4%
1.1%Dividend yield1.0%
TWD 6.00Dividend per share$0.83
Profitability
25%Operating margin27%
0.88×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.35×
16%Return on equity37%
5%Return on assets13%
Growth
23%Revenue growth (YoY)58%
3.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)22.3%
14.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)21.8%
+8.6%Value creation/yr+28.9%
Balance & size
10.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)16.2×
0.36×Debt / equity1.09×
$50BMarket cap$186B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Amphenol leads: 3 to 12 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Yageoof which business quality 63 · market factors 53 Amphenolof which business quality 67 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
43
67
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
57
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
72
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
72
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
55
29
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
38
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
78
74
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
69
44
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
83
71

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyYageoPrice TWD 545AmphenolPrice $82.07
DCF Models-34%below the priceTWD 358+17%above the price$96.16
Earnings-Based-74%below the priceTWD 143-42%below the price$47.38
Dividend Discount-83%below the priceTWD 95.24-86%below the price$11.48
Multiples-52%below the priceTWD 260-4%close to the price$78.76
Asset-Based-90%below the priceTWD 55.61-91%below the price$7.30
Growth DCF-48%below the priceTWD 283-1%close to the price$80.84
Economic Profit-74%below the priceTWD 144-45%below the price$45.51
Growth Earnings-52%below the priceTWD 264+2%close to the price$83.60
Minimum-90%below the priceTWD 55.61-91%below the price$7.30
Maximum-34%below the priceTWD 358+17%above the price$96.16
Median-63%below the priceTWD 202-23%below the price$63.07
Geometric mean-68%below the priceTWD 172-49%below the price$41.76

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Yageo: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Amphenol: 14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Yageo
Bear TWD 166Fair Value TWD 289Bull TWD 399
TWD 545 = current price (white tick)
Amphenol
Bear $51.05Fair Value $97.19Bull $121
$82.07 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Yageo · Information Technology

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-47% · below median

Amphenol · Information Technology

Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+18% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the more attractively valued of the two: Yageo trades at TWD 545 versus a fair value of TWD 289 (-47%), while Amphenol trades at $82.07 versus $97.19 (+18%).

Amphenol has the higher quality score (68/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.