EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Alabdullatif vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Alabdullatif (2340) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Alabdullatif trades at SAR 12.30 versus a fair value of SAR 4.36 (-65%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$42.80 versus HK$75.65 (+77%).
Alabdullatif
2340.SR · SAR · Consumer Discretionary
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSAR 12.30
Fair ValueSAR 4.36
Quality51/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+77%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$42.80
Fair ValueHK$75.65
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

AlabdullatifShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
41.3×P/E (TTM)9.9×
0.49×P/S (TTM)2.15×
0.25×P/B1.78×
5.5×EV/EBITDA7.2×
—PEG0.88×
—Dividend yield5.2%
—Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
4%Net margin19%
11%Operating margin18%
2%Return on equity16%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
-12%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
-4.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
3.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.02×Debt / equity0.01×
$268MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 3 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Alabdullatifof which business quality 47 · market factors 59 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 28
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
19
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
73
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
10
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
51
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
92
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
84
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
51
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
44
11
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Alabdullatif

DCF ModelsSAR 3.25
Earnings-BasedSAR 1.40
Dividend DiscountSAR 0.07
MultiplesSAR 4.46
Asset-BasedSAR 8.72
Economic ProfitSAR 4.21
Growth EarningsSAR 4.36

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

7 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Alabdullatif
Bear SAR 3.05Fair Value SAR 4.36Bull SAR 5.58
SAR 12.30 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$46.78Fair Value HK$75.65Bull HK$95.17
HK$42.80 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Alabdullatif · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+77% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Alabdullatif trades at SAR 12.30 versus a fair value of SAR 4.36 (-65%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$42.80 versus HK$75.65 (+77%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →
Alabdullatif · Shenzhou International Group Holdings

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Alabdullatif

Amazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Shenzhou International Group Holdings

Tesla vs PDD HoldingsTesla vs Sony GroupHome Depot vs Toyota Motor CorporationHome Depot vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.