EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Beijing Easpring Material Tech vs Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Beijing Easpring Material Tech (300073) and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite (3750) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Beijing Easpring Material Tech as the less overvalued of the two: Beijing Easpring Material Tech trades at ¥42.10 versus a fair value of ¥37.12 (-12%), while Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite trades at HK$633 versus HK$391 (-38%).
Beijing Easpring Material Tech
300073.SHE · CNY · Materials
-12%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥42.10
Fair Value¥37.12
Quality48/100
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite
3750.HK · HKD · Industrials
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$633
Fair ValueHK$391
Quality64/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Beijing Easpring Material TechContemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite
Valuation
35.3×P/E (TTM)33.7×
2.22×P/S (TTM)6.73×
1.96×P/B9.35×
18.3×EV/EBITDA26.0×
1.31×PEG2.29×
0.6%Dividend yield—
¥0.28Dividend per share—
Profitability
6%Net margin17%
9%Operating margin19%
6%Return on equity25%
2%Return on assets5%
Growth
137%Revenue growth (YoY)52%
-21.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.8%
26.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)53.1%
Balance & size
0.00×Debt / equity0.24×
$4BMarket cap$402B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Beijing Easpring Material Techof which business quality 50 · market factors 34 Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limiteof which business quality 65 · market factors 68
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
26
49
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
54
63
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
34
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
99
86
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
53
23
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
58
66
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
68
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
71
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
32
64

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Beijing Easpring Material Tech

Earnings-Based¥36.10
Dividend Discount¥3.30
Multiples¥23.03
Asset-Based¥18.09
Economic Profit¥21.50
Growth Earnings¥45.29

14 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite

DCF ModelsHK$600
Earnings-BasedHK$565
Dividend DiscountHK$139
MultiplesHK$307
Asset-BasedHK$50.49
Growth DCFHK$591
Economic ProfitHK$239
Growth EarningsHK$739

19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Beijing Easpring Material Tech
Bear ¥37.12Fair Value ¥37.12Bull ¥44.44
¥42.10 = current price (white tick)
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite
Bear HK$294Fair Value HK$391Bull HK$957
HK$633 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Beijing Easpring Material Tech · Materials

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-12% · above median

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite · Industrials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Beijing Easpring Material Tech as the less overvalued of the two: Beijing Easpring Material Tech trades at ¥42.10 versus a fair value of ¥37.12 (-12%), while Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite trades at HK$633 versus HK$391 (-38%).

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →
Beijing Easpring Material Tech · Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Beijing Easpring Material Tech

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limite

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.