EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhejiang Huace Film TV vs Netflix: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhejiang Huace Film TV (300133) and Netflix (NFLX) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Netflix as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Huace Film TV trades at ¥7.67 versus a fair value of ¥2.35 (-69%), while Netflix trades at $82.67 versus $49.35 (-40%).
Zhejiang Huace Film TV
300133.SHE · CNY · Communication Services
-69%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥7.67
Fair Value¥2.35
Quality51/100
Netflix
NFLX · USD · Communication Services
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$82.67
Fair Value$49.35
Quality87/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Zhejiang Huace Film TVNetflix
Valuation
85.2×P/E (TTM)23.7×
5.30×P/S (TTM)6.59×
1.91×P/B11.61×
42.3×EV/EBITDA21.9×
1.71×PEG1.44×
−69.4%Fair value upside−40.3%
0.1%Dividend yield
¥0.01Dividend per share
Profitability
25%Operating margin32%
EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.61×
3%Return on equity48%
1%Return on assets15%
Growth
-33%Revenue growth (YoY)16%
4.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.6%
-5.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.6%
−6.3%Value creation/yr+33.1%
Balance & size
5.9×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)17.2×
0.05×Debt / equity0.51×
$2BMarket cap$309B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Netflix leads: 3 to 11 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhejiang Huace Film TVof which business quality 51 · market factors 29 Netflixof which business quality 82 · market factors 24
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
85
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
45
81
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
32
73
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
87
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
54
78
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
36
38
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
23
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
26
10
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
98

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyZhejiang Huace Film TVPrice ¥7.67NetflixPrice $82.67
DCF Modelsn/a+14%close to the price$94.36
Earnings-Based-71%below the price¥2.22-26%below the price$60.95
Dividend Discount-85%below the price¥1.12n/a
Multiples-62%below the price¥2.95-47%below the price$43.58
Asset-Based-66%below the price¥2.59-95%below the price$4.23
Growth DCFn/a-22%below the price$64.20
Economic Profit-63%below the price¥2.81-51%below the price$40.90
Growth Earnings-69%below the price¥2.35-2%close to the price$81.21
Minimum-85%below the price¥1.12-95%below the price$4.23
Maximum-62%below the price¥2.95+14%close to the price$94.36
Median-68%below the price¥2.47-26%below the price$60.95
Geometric mean-71%below the price¥2.23-49%below the price$41.88

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Zhejiang Huace Film TV: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Netflix: 17 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zhejiang Huace Film TV
Bear ¥1.67Fair Value ¥2.35Bull ¥2.78
¥7.67 = current price (white tick)
Netflix
Bear $36.69Fair Value $49.35Bull $106
$82.67 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhejiang Huace Film TV · Communication Services

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-69% · bottom 25%

Netflix · Communication Services

Quality score87 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-40% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Netflix as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Huace Film TV trades at ¥7.67 versus a fair value of ¥2.35 (-69%), while Netflix trades at $82.67 versus $49.35 (-40%).

Netflix has the higher quality score (87/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.