EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co vs Schlumberger: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co (300471) and Schlumberger (SLB) compare, as of Sep 14, 2026.

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Schlumberger as the less overvalued of the two: Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co trades at ¥9.72 versus a fair value of ¥4.12 (-58%), while Schlumberger trades at $56.06 versus $28.66 (-49%).
Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co
300471.SHE · CNY · Energy
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥9.72
Fair Value¥4.12
Quality60/100
Schlumberger
SLB · USD · Energy
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$56.06
Fair Value$28.66
Quality52/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding CoSchlumberger
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)20.7×
0.58×P/S (TTM)1.96×
0.41×P/B2.69×
—EV/EBITDA10.3×
—PEG1.62×
−57.6%Fair value upside−48.9%
0.2%Dividend yield2.0%
—Dividend per share$1.15
Profitability
-2%Operating margin12%
-0%Return on equity14%
1%Return on assets6%
Growth
19%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
14.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.3%
17.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.6%
−17.2%Value creation/yr+15.9%
Balance & size
7.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.8×
0.03×Debt / equity0.37×
$646MMarket cap$70B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed

Schlumberger leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Coof which business quality 63 · market factors 31 Schlumbergerof which business quality 54 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
28
42
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
98
18
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
78
67
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
58
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
60
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
22
70
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
95
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
44
58

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding CoPrice ¥9.72SchlumbergerPrice $56.06
DCF Models-46%below the price¥5.21-36%below the price$35.98
Earnings-Based-98%below the price¥0.18-62%below the price$21.58
Dividend Discount-97%below the price¥0.28-68%below the price$18.13
Multiples-97%below the price¥0.25-46%below the price$30.02
Asset-Based-77%below the price¥2.23-79%below the price$11.70
Growth DCF-26%below the price¥7.22-27%below the price$40.81
Economic Profit-79%below the price¥2.06-51%below the price$27.29
Growth Earnings-98%below the price¥0.24-49%below the price$28.48
Minimum-98%below the price¥0.18-79%below the price$11.70
Maximum-26%below the price¥7.22-27%below the price$40.81
Median-88%below the price¥1.17-50%below the price$27.88
Geometric mean-91%below the price¥0.92-55%below the price$25.08

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co: 20 of 20 models see the stock below the current price.

Schlumberger: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Schlumberger
Price $56.06
Fair Value $28.66
Bear $21.17Bull $37.03

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co · Energy

Quality score60 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-58% · bottom 25%

Schlumberger · Energy

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-49% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Schlumberger as the less overvalued of the two: Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co trades at ¥9.72 versus a fair value of ¥4.12 (-58%), while Schlumberger trades at $56.06 versus $28.66 (-49%).

Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co has the higher quality score (60/100).

See the full analysis →
Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co · Schlumberger

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Chengdu Huaqi Houpu Holding Co

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Schlumberger

Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron Technology
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.