EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg (3626) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg trades at HK$2.10 versus a fair value of HK$0.35 (−83.3%), while Cintas trades at $195 versus $188 (−3.6%).
Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg
3626.HK · HKD · Materials
−83.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$2.10
Fair ValueHK$0.35
Quality78/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
−3.6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$195
Fair Value$188
Quality78/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl HldgCintas
Valuation
170.0×P/E (TTM)37.4×
n/aForward P/E (FY2028)31.9×
4.02×P/S (TTM)6.85×
17.15×P/B15.42×
40.4×EV/EBITDA25.9×
n/aPEG3.14×
−83.3%Fair value upside−3.6%
6.4%Dividend yield1.0%
n/aDividend per share$1.87
Profitability
6.8%Operating margin24.1%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.18×
9.1%Return on equity41.4%
8.0%Return on assets16.7%
Growth
2.1%Revenue growth (YoY)10.9%
8.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
7.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
+16.2%Value creation/yr+14.8%
Balance & size
6.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)24.5×
n/aDebt / equity0.28×
$49MMarket cap$79B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Cintas leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldgof which business quality 77 · market factors 23 Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 57
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
63
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
88
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
71
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
75
71
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
16
75
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
38
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
45
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
90

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyHang Sang (Siu Po) Intl HldgPrice HK$2.10CintasPrice $195
DCF Models−69.5%below the priceHK$0.64−48.1%below the price$101
Earnings-Based−86.2%below the priceHK$0.29−74.4%below the price$49.99
Dividend Discount−40.2%below the priceHK$1.26−84.2%below the price$30.90
Multiples−81.7%below the priceHK$0.39−59.9%below the price$78.27
Asset-Based−96.2%below the priceHK$0.08−95.6%below the price$8.62
Growth DCF−66.2%below the priceHK$0.71−59.2%below the price$79.57
Economic Profit−87.1%below the priceHK$0.27−73.2%below the price$52.33
Growth Earnings−91.0%below the priceHK$0.19−58.2%below the price$81.48
Minimum−96.2%below the priceHK$0.08−95.6%below the price$8.62
Maximum−40.2%below the priceHK$1.26−48.1%below the price$101
Median−83.9%below the priceHK$0.34−66.5%below the price$65.30
Geometric mean−83.0%below the priceHK$0.36−74.6%below the price$49.46

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Cintas: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg
Price HK$2.10
Fair Value HK$0.35
Bear HK$0.32Bull HK$0.38
Cintas
Price $195
Fair Value $188
Bear $114Bull $242

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg · Materials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−83.3% · bottom 25%

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−3.6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg trades at HK$2.10 versus a fair value of HK$0.35 (−83.3%), while Cintas trades at $195 versus $188 (−3.6%).

Hang Sang (Siu Po) Intl Hldg has the higher quality score (78/100).

Open Cintas live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.