EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zico Holdings vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zico Holdings (40W) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zico Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Zico Holdings trades at S$0.06 versus a fair value of S$0.05 (-15%), while Cintas trades at $198 versus $95.19 (-52%).
Zico Holdings
40W.SG · SGD · Industrials
-15%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.06
Fair ValueS$0.05
Quality45/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$198
Fair Value$95.19
Quality78/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Zico HoldingsCintas
Valuation
P/E (TTM)42.0×
1.13×P/S (TTM)7.33×
0.55×P/B16.06×
EV/EBITDA27.0×
PEG3.06×
2.0%Dividend yield1.0%
S$0.00Dividend per share$1.74
Profitability
2%Net margin18%
-32%Operating margin24%
2%Return on equity41%
-7%Return on assets16%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-39.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
-25.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.47×
$16MMarket cap$83B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Cintas leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zico Holdingsof which business quality 46 · market factors 54 Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
5
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
64
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
54
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
60
40
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
52
90

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Zico Holdings

DCF ModelsS$0.07
Earnings-BasedS$0.02
Dividend DiscountS$0.02
MultiplesS$0.04
Asset-BasedS$0.05
Economic ProfitS$0.05
Growth EarningsS$0.04

9 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Cintas

DCF Models$96.89
Earnings-Based$48.67
Dividend Discount$30.85
Multiples$76.91
Asset-Based$8.61
Growth DCF$74.33
Economic Profit$58.94
Growth Earnings$81.35

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zico Holdings
Bear S$0.04Fair Value S$0.05Bull S$0.06
S$0.06 = current price (white tick)
Cintas
Bear $55.52Fair Value $95.19Bull $121
$198 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zico Holdings · Industrials

Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside-15% · above median

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-52% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zico Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Zico Holdings trades at S$0.06 versus a fair value of S$0.05 (-15%), while Cintas trades at $198 versus $95.19 (-52%).

Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.