STOCK COMPARISON
Daxin Materials vs Linde: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Daxin Materials (5234) and Linde (LIN) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Daxin Materials trades at TWD 326 versus a fair value of TWD 97.48 (-70%), while Linde trades at $490 versus $222 (-55%).
Daxin Materials
5234.TW · TWD · Materials
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 326
Fair ValueTWD 97.48
Quality79/100
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
-55%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$490
Fair Value$222
Quality70/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Daxin MaterialsLinde
Valuation
45.9×P/E (TTM)34.1×
7.34×P/S (TTM)6.95×
9.83×P/B6.30×
30.2×EV/EBITDA18.9×
—PEG2.18×
2.0%Dividend yield1.2%
TWD 6.50Dividend per share$6.10
Profitability
17%Net margin20%
20%Operating margin28%
26%Return on equity18%
11%Return on assets7%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
6.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
1.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
Balance & size
0.02×Debt / equity0.54×
$1BMarket cap$241B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Linde leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Daxin Materialsof which business quality 76 · market factors 41
Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
73
51
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
76
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
83
69
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
76
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
20
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
52
52
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
85
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Daxin Materials
DCF ModelsTWD 109
Earnings-BasedTWD 80.19
Dividend DiscountTWD 71.30
MultiplesTWD 107
Asset-BasedTWD 23.01
Growth DCFTWD 94.61
Economic ProfitTWD 71.61
Growth EarningsTWD 102
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Linde
DCF Models$211
Earnings-Based$132
Dividend Discount$116
Multiples$239
Asset-Based$55.42
Growth DCF$155
Economic Profit$156
Growth Earnings$204
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Daxin Materials
Bear TWD 69.23Fair Value TWD 97.48Bull TWD 132
TWD 326 = current price (white tick)
Linde
Bear $121Fair Value $222Bull $291
$490 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Daxin Materials · Materials
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%
Linde · Materials
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-55% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Daxin Materials trades at TWD 326 versus a fair value of TWD 97.48 (-70%), while Linde trades at $490 versus $222 (-55%).
Daxin Materials has the higher quality score (79/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
