EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nam Liong Global vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nam Liong Global (5450) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Nam Liong Global trades at TWD 15.50 versus a fair value of TWD 4.36 (-72%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$44.52 versus HK$75.65 (+70%).
Nam Liong Global
5450.TWO · TWD · Information Technology
-72%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 15.50
Fair ValueTWD 4.36
Quality51/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+70%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$44.52
Fair ValueHK$75.65
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Nam Liong GlobalShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
123.8×P/E (TTM)9.9×
0.81×P/S (TTM)2.15×
1.12×P/B1.78×
12.6×EV/EBITDA7.2×
—PEG0.88×
1.5%Dividend yield5.2%
TWD 0.25Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
1%Net margin19%
2%Operating margin18%
1%Return on equity16%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
-7.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
-1.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.26×Debt / equity0.01×
$61MMarket cap$9B
weakGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 2 to 11 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nam Liong Globalof which business quality 51 · market factors 55 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 29
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
28
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
52
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
53
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
93
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
73
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
53
20
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
15
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
83
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nam Liong Global

DCF ModelsTWD 10.40
Earnings-BasedTWD 3.63
MultiplesTWD 6.10
Asset-BasedTWD 9.64
Growth DCFTWD 11.43
Economic ProfitTWD 6.55
Growth EarningsTWD 3.33

19 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

10 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nam Liong Global
Bear TWD 3.05Fair Value TWD 4.36Bull TWD 5.45
TWD 15.50 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$46.78Fair Value HK$75.65Bull HK$95.17
HK$44.52 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nam Liong Global · Information Technology

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-72% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+70% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Nam Liong Global trades at TWD 15.50 versus a fair value of TWD 4.36 (-72%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$44.52 versus HK$75.65 (+70%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →
Nam Liong Global · Shenzhou International Group Holdings

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Nam Liong Global

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Shenzhou International Group Holdings

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor CorporationTesla vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.