UMS Holdings vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how UMS Holdings (558) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: UMS Holdings trades at S$2.87 versus a fair value of S$0.69 (-76%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,621 versus €604 (-63%).
UMS Holdings
558.SG · SGD · Information Technology
-76%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$2.87
Fair ValueS$0.69
Quality48/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,621
Fair Value€604
Quality82/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
UMS HoldingsASML Holding
Valuation
57.4×P/E (TTM)60.6×
6.85×P/S (TTM)19.38×
4.20×P/B34.91×
22.7×EV/EBITDA50.0×
1.12×PEG2.19×
2.0%Dividend yield0.3%
S$0.05Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
17%Net margin30%
20%Operating margin37%
10%Return on equity54%
6%Return on assets16%
Growth
20%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
-12.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
8.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.14×
$2BMarket cap$685B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
ASML Holding leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
UMS Holdingsof which business quality 48 · market factors 65ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 73
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
49
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
58
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
43
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
87
86
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
51
95
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
92
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
UMS Holdings
DCF ModelsS$0.69
Earnings-BasedS$0.44
Dividend DiscountS$0.63
MultiplesS$1.06
Asset-BasedS$0.32
Growth DCFS$0.07
Economic ProfitS$0.55
Growth EarningsS$1.12
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
ASML Holding
DCF Models€822
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€515
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€756
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€675
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
UMS Holdings
Bear S$0.37Fair Value S$0.69Bull S$1.12
S$2.87 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €425Fair Value €604Bull €877
€1,621 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
UMS Holdings · Information Technology
Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-76% · bottom 25%
ASML Holding · Information Technology
Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-63% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: UMS Holdings trades at S$2.87 versus a fair value of S$0.69 (-76%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,621 versus €604 (-63%).
ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
