EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Acesian Partners vs DBS Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Acesian Partners (5FW) and DBS Group Holdings (D05) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Acesian Partners as the more attractively valued of the two: Acesian Partners trades at S$0.02 versus a fair value of S$0.03 (+27.1%), while DBS Group Holdings trades at S$77.50 versus S$40.39 (−47.9%).
Acesian Partners
5FW.SG · SGD · Industrials
+27.1%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceS$0.02
Fair ValueS$0.03
Quality44/100
DBS Group Holdings
D05.SG · SGD · Financials
−47.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$77.50
Fair ValueS$40.39
Quality65/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Acesian PartnersDBS Group Holdings
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)19.8×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)17.5×
1.43×P/S (TTM)9.70×
0.44×P/B3.19×
n/aPEG2.63×
+27.1%Fair value upside−47.9%
n/aDividend yield3.7%
n/aDividend per shareS$2.85
Profitability
-23.2%Operating margin60.7%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.99×
-11.8%Return on equity16.2%
-6.9%Return on assets1.2%
Growth
44.2%Revenue growth (YoY)6.8%
-45.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.6%
-8.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.4%
n/aValue creation/yr+12.7%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)0.6×
n/aDebt / equity0.69×
$9MMarket cap$172B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

DBS Group Holdings leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Acesian Partnersof which business quality 44 · market factors 32 DBS Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 93
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
4
38
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
84
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
95
56
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
75
78
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
100
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
34
86
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
11
97
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
90
65

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAcesian PartnersPrice S$0.02DBS Group HoldingsPrice S$77.50
Dividend Discountn/a−34.9%below the priceS$50.43
Multiplesn/a−45.9%below the priceS$41.94
Asset-Based+25.0%above the priceS$0.03−79.1%below the priceS$16.22
Economic Profitn/a−59.8%below the priceS$31.19
Minimum+25.0%above the priceS$0.03−79.1%below the priceS$16.22
Maximum+25.0%above the priceS$0.03−34.9%below the priceS$50.43
Median+25.0%above the priceS$0.03−52.8%below the priceS$36.57
Geometric mean+25.0%above the priceS$0.03−58.5%below the priceS$32.16

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Acesian Partners: 0 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

DBS Group Holdings: 6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Acesian Partners
Price S$0.02
Fair Value S$0.03
Bear S$0.03Bull S$0.03
DBS Group Holdings
Price S$77.50
Fair Value S$40.39
Bear S$29.31Bull S$50.48

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Acesian Partners · Industrials

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside+27.1% · above median

DBS Group Holdings · Financials

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−47.9% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Acesian Partners as the more attractively valued of the two: Acesian Partners trades at S$0.02 versus a fair value of S$0.03 (+27.1%), while DBS Group Holdings trades at S$77.50 versus S$40.39 (−47.9%).

DBS Group Holdings has the higher quality score (65/100).

Open Acesian Partners live analysis →
Acesian Partners · DBS Group Holdings

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Acesian Partners

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta Platforms

Related to DBS Group Holdings

Broadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron TechnologyAdvanced Micro Devices vs MicrosoftIntel vs Microsoft
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.