EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sinochem International vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sinochem International (600500) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Sinochem International trades at ¥5.51 versus a fair value of ¥1.09 (-80%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.89 versus HK$22.56 (+90%).
Sinochem International
600500.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-80%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.51
Fair Value¥1.09
Quality32/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+90%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$11.89
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality45/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sinochem InternationalCitic Pacific
Valuation
P/E (TTM)4.8×
0.06×P/S (TTM)0.34×
0.28×P/B0.37×
17.1×EV/EBITDA2.8×
PEG1.76×
Dividend yield5.2%
Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
-4%Net margin6%
0%Operating margin30%
-13%Return on equity8%
-1%Return on assets1%
Growth
-10%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
-18.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
-2.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
2.07×Debt / equity2.03×
$3BMarket cap$41B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive

Citic Pacific leads: 2 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sinochem Internationalof which business quality 30 · market factors 61 Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
14
23
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
15
20
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
46
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
74
36
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
55
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
40
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sinochem International

Multiples¥1.12
Asset-Based¥1.96

2 of 2 models see the stock below the current price.

Citic Pacific

DCF ModelsHK$25.60
Earnings-BasedHK$65.33
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$41.60
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.48

1 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sinochem International
Bear ¥1.09Fair Value ¥1.09Bull ¥2.58
¥5.51 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$11.89 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sinochem International · Industrials

Quality score32 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-80% · bottom 25%

Citic Pacific · Industrials

Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside+90% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Sinochem International trades at ¥5.51 versus a fair value of ¥1.09 (-80%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.89 versus HK$22.56 (+90%).

Citic Pacific has the higher quality score (45/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.