EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Yangtze Power Co vs Cloudberry Clean Energy As: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Yangtze Power Co (600900) and Cloudberry Clean Energy As (CLOUD) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.36 versus a fair value of ¥30.89 (+9%), while Cloudberry Clean Energy As trades at NOK 11.70 versus NOK 5.93 (-49%).
China Yangtze Power Co
600900.SHG · CNY · Utilities
+9%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price¥28.36
Fair Value¥30.89
Quality57/100
Cloudberry Clean Energy As
CLOUD.OL · NOK · Utilities
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 11.70
Fair ValueNOK 5.93
Quality32/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

China Yangtze Power CoCloudberry Clean Energy As
Valuation
19.3×P/E (TTM)21.3×
7.95×P/S (TTM)7.31×
2.98×P/B0.90×
13.3×EV/EBITDA32.6×
+8.9%Fair value upside−49.3%
3.5%Dividend yieldn/a
¥1.00Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
49%Operating margin21%
0.82×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
16%Return on equity4%
5%Return on assets0%
Growth
6%Revenue growth (YoY)68%
8.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)35.0%
8.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)169.0%
+7.4%Value creation/yr+10.7%
Balance & size
4.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.8×
0.87×Debt / equity0.67×
$104BMarket cap$451M
expensiveGrowth qualityexpensive

Cloudberry Clean Energy As leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Yangtze Power Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 67 Cloudberry Clean Energy Asof which business quality 33 · market factors 47
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
22
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
28
59
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
86
53
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
37
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
19
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
50
35
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
57
27
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
69
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChina Yangtze Power CoPrice ¥28.36Cloudberry Clean Energy AsPrice NOK 11.70
DCF Models-3%close to the price¥27.65n/a
Earnings-Based-39%below the price¥17.18-40%below the priceNOK 6.98
Dividend Discount-15%close to the price¥24.12n/a
Multiples-39%below the price¥17.26-71%below the priceNOK 3.39
Asset-Based-78%below the price¥6.38-19%below the priceNOK 9.47
Growth DCF-13%close to the price¥24.68n/a
Economic Profit-65%below the price¥9.82-28%below the priceNOK 8.38
Growth Earnings-12%close to the price¥24.89-25%below the priceNOK 8.72
Minimum-78%below the price¥6.38-71%below the priceNOK 3.39
Maximum-3%close to the price¥27.65-19%below the priceNOK 9.47
Median-27%below the price¥20.69-28%below the priceNOK 8.38
Geometric mean-39%below the price¥17.19-40%below the priceNOK 6.96

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

China Yangtze Power Co: 22 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Cloudberry Clean Energy As: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

China Yangtze Power Co
Price ¥28.36
Fair Value ¥30.89
Bear ¥21.42Bull ¥39.78
Cloudberry Clean Energy As
Price NOK 11.70
Fair Value NOK 5.93
Bear NOK 5.19Bull NOK 7.71

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Yangtze Power Co · Utilities

Quality score57 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+9% · above median

Cloudberry Clean Energy As · Utilities

Quality score32 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-49% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.36 versus a fair value of ¥30.89 (+9%), while Cloudberry Clean Energy As trades at NOK 11.70 versus NOK 5.93 (-49%).

China Yangtze Power Co has the higher quality score (57/100).

Open China Yangtze Power Co live analysis →
China Yangtze Power Co · Cloudberry Clean Energy As

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China Yangtze Power Co

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Cloudberry Clean Energy As

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.