Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA (CLOUD) Fair Value & Analysis

Utilities · NO · Market cap 4.2B NOK

Pricekr 11.28
Fair Valuekr 7.91
Upside-29.9%
Quality84/100
Evidence: Medium Range kr 6.10 – kr 7.91

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

Analysis

Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA (CLOUD) currently trades at kr 11.28, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 7.91 — implying the stock looks roughly 29.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 84/100 (high quality), in the Utilities sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

About the company

Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA operates as a renewable energy company in Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Sweden. It operates through Projects, Commercial, and Asset Management segments. The company engages in the development, production, and operation of renewable assets, such as hydro, wind, solar, and storage, as well as solar power and energy storage projects. Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA was founded in 2017 and is based in Oslo, Norway.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA (CLOUD) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 7.91 versus a price of kr 11.28 — about −30% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CLOUD?
Our 21-model fair value for Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA is kr 7.91 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 11.28.
What is the quality score of CLOUD?
Cloudberry Clean Energy ASA has a Quality Score of 84/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.