EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Yangtze Power Co vs Eolus Vind AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Yangtze Power Co (600900) and Eolus Vind AB (publ) (EOLU-B) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.42 versus a fair value of ¥25.13 (-12%), while Eolus Vind AB (publ) trades at SEK 46.45 versus SEK 29.74 (-36%).
China Yangtze Power Co
600900.SHG · CNY · Utilities
-12%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥28.42
Fair Value¥25.13
Quality57/100
Eolus Vind AB (publ)
EOLU-B.ST · SEK · Industrials
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 46.45
Fair ValueSEK 29.74
Quality67/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Yangtze Power CoEolus Vind AB (publ)
Valuation
19.6×P/E (TTM)—
7.84×P/S (TTM)0.04×
2.94×P/B0.09×
13.1×EV/EBITDA—
−11.6%Fair value upside−36.0%
3.5%Dividend yield4.8%
¥1.00Dividend per shareSEK 2.25
Profitability
49%Operating margin34%
0.82×EBIT margin trend (5Y)—
16%Return on equity-18%
5%Return on assets-7%
Growth
6%Revenue growth (YoY)-68%
8.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
8.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)23.0%
+7.4%Value creation/yr—
Balance & size
4.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)—
0.87×Debt / equity0.47×
$102BMarket cap$107M
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Eolus Vind AB (publ) leads: 3 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Yangtze Power Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 68 Eolus Vind AB (publ)of which business quality 68 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
28
40
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
86
100
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
84
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
84
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
51
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
66
51
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
69
83

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChina Yangtze Power CoPrice ¥28.42Eolus Vind AB (publ)Price SEK 46.45
DCF Models-7%close to the price¥26.40+2342%above the priceSEK 1,134
Earnings-Based-40%below the price¥17.18n/a
Dividend Discount-8%close to the price¥26.19n/a
Multiples-39%below the price¥17.26+544%above the priceSEK 299
Asset-Based-78%below the price¥6.38-30%below the priceSEK 32.53
Growth DCF-21%below the price¥22.39+2485%above the priceSEK 1,201
Economic Profit-63%below the price¥10.45n/a
Growth Earnings-12%close to the price¥24.89n/a
Minimum-78%below the price¥6.38-30%below the priceSEK 32.53
Maximum-7%close to the price¥26.40+2485%above the priceSEK 1,201
Median-30%below the price¥19.82+1443%above the priceSEK 717
Geometric mean-40%below the price¥17.19+630%above the priceSEK 339

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

China Yangtze Power Co: 21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Eolus Vind AB (publ): 1 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Yangtze Power Co
Bear ¥16.47Fair Value ¥25.13Bull ¥31.42
¥28.42 = current price (white tick)
Eolus Vind AB (publ)
Bear SEK 20.82Fair Value SEK 29.74Bull SEK 38.66
SEK 46.45 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Yangtze Power Co · Utilities

Quality score57 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-12% · above median

Eolus Vind AB (publ) · Industrials

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.42 versus a fair value of ¥25.13 (-12%), while Eolus Vind AB (publ) trades at SEK 46.45 versus SEK 29.74 (-36%).

Eolus Vind AB (publ) has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →
China Yangtze Power Co · Eolus Vind AB (publ)

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China Yangtze Power Co

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Eolus Vind AB (publ)

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.