EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co vs United Parcel Service: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co (601607) and United Parcel Service (UPS) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co trades at ¥16.70 versus a fair value of ¥33.96 (+103%), while United Parcel Service trades at $105 versus $105 (+0%).
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co
601607.SHG · CNY · Health Care
+103%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥16.70
Fair Value¥33.96
Quality51/100
United Parcel Service
UPS · USD · Industrials
+0%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$105
Fair Value$105
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding CoUnited Parcel Service
Valuation
10.7×P/E (TTM)19.0×
0.22×P/S (TTM)1.13×
0.82×P/B6.14×
3.1×EV/EBITDA9.9×
9.25×PEG1.85×
2.9%Dividend yield5.6%
¥0.47Dividend per share$6.56
Profitability
2%Net margin6%
3%Operating margin6%
8%Return on equity33%
2%Return on assets7%
Growth
6%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
6.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.9%
8.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.0%
Balance & size
0.06×Debt / equity1.45×
$9BMarket cap$100B
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Coof which business quality 49 · market factors 51 United Parcel Serviceof which business quality 59 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
41
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
43
31
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
31
45
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
49
47
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
84
95
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
63
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
67
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
70
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co

DCF Models¥53.89
Earnings-Based¥30.43
Multiples¥37.09
Asset-Based¥13.71
Growth DCF¥45.25
Economic Profit¥29.46
Growth Earnings¥42.67

1 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

United Parcel Service

DCF Models$103
Earnings-Based$69.77
Multiples$141
Asset-Based$14.56
Growth DCF$89.84
Economic Profit$77.20
Growth Earnings$127

11 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co
Bear ¥25.47Fair Value ¥33.96Bull ¥42.45
¥16.70 = current price (white tick)
United Parcel Service
Bear $58.10Fair Value $105Bull $165
$105 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co · Health Care

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside+103% · Top 25%

United Parcel Service · Industrials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+0% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co trades at ¥16.70 versus a fair value of ¥33.96 (+103%), while United Parcel Service trades at $105 versus $105 (+0%).

United Parcel Service has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.