Lintes Technology Co vs Cisco Systems: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lintes Technology Co (6715) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Lintes Technology Co trades at TWD 390 versus a fair value of TWD 49.93 (-87%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.36 (-29%).
Lintes Technology Co
6715.TW · TWD · Information Technology
-87%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 390
Fair ValueTWD 49.93
Quality58/100
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$113
Fair Value$80.36
Quality74/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Lintes Technology CoCisco Systems
Valuation
233.8×P/E (TTM)40.4×
16.19×P/S (TTM)7.87×
8.25×P/B10.21×
84.1×EV/EBITDA29.0×
—PEG1.68×
0.5%Dividend yield1.4%
TWD 1.94Dividend per share$1.65
Profitability
8%Net margin20%
16%Operating margin25%
4%Return on equity25%
3%Return on assets7%
Growth
17%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-20.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.2%
-6.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.8%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity0.49×
$884MMarket cap$478B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Cisco Systems leads: 3 to 10 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Lintes Technology Coof which business quality 60 · market factors 69Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
8
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
75
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
59
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
75
82
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
82
88
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
97
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Lintes Technology Co
DCF ModelsTWD 70.24
Earnings-BasedTWD 32.08
Dividend DiscountTWD 64.15
MultiplesTWD 50.58
Asset-BasedTWD 34.56
Growth DCFTWD 65.57
Economic ProfitTWD 39.66
Growth EarningsTWD 41.06
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Cisco Systems
DCF Models$56.75
Earnings-Based$25.45
Dividend Discount$31.20
Multiples$40.16
Asset-Based$7.96
Growth DCF$56.88
Economic Profit$28.50
Growth Earnings$40.89
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Lintes Technology Co
Bear TWD 37.45Fair Value TWD 49.93Bull TWD 62.41
TWD 390 = current price (white tick)
Cisco Systems
Bear $51.09Fair Value $80.36Bull $102
$113 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Lintes Technology Co · Information Technology
Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-87% · bottom 25%
Cisco Systems · Information Technology
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-29% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Lintes Technology Co trades at TWD 390 versus a fair value of TWD 49.93 (-87%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.36 (-29%).
Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
