EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co vs Linde: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co (688116) and Linde (LIN) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co trades at ¥33.64 versus a fair value of ¥16.80 (-50%), while Linde trades at $470 versus $441 (-6%).
Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co
688116.SHG · CNY · Information Technology
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥33.64
Fair Value¥16.80
Quality38/100
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
-6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$470
Fair Value$441
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Jiangsu Cnano Technology CoLinde
Valuation
56.2×P/E (TTM)30.8×
9.59×P/S (TTM)6.95×
3.24×P/B6.30× · book value is mostly goodwill
30.5×EV/EBITDA18.9×
n/aPEG2.18×
−50.1%Fair value upside−6.1%
0.2%Dividend yield1.3%
¥0.08Dividend per share$6.10
Profitability
22%Operating margin28%
0.81×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.84×
7%Return on equity18%
3%Return on assets7%
Growth
-6%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
3.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
30.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
+11.2%Value creation/yr+24.2%
Balance & size
6.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)42.1×
0.30×Debt / equity0.54×
$2BMarket cap$241B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Linde leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Coof which business quality 39 · market factors 25 Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
51
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
22
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
26
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
68
69
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
22
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
55
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
18
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
42
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
55
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyJiangsu Cnano Technology CoPrice ¥33.64LindePrice $470
DCF Models-78%below the price¥7.46-54%below the price$216
Earnings-Based-71%below the price¥9.81-72%below the price$132
Dividend Discount-92%below the price¥2.81-75%below the price$116
Multiples-58%below the price¥14.03-49%below the price$239
Asset-Based-79%below the price¥6.92-88%below the price$55.42
Growth DCFn/a-66%below the price$159
Economic Profit-81%below the price¥6.37-67%below the price$156
Growth Earnings-49%below the price¥17.05-57%below the price$204
Minimum-92%below the price¥2.81-88%below the price$55.42
Maximum-49%below the price¥17.05-49%below the price$239
Median-78%below the price¥7.46-66%below the price$158
Geometric mean-76%below the price¥8.04-69%below the price$147

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co: 17 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Linde: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co
Price ¥33.64
Fair Value ¥16.80
Bear ¥11.94Bull ¥21.32
Linde
Price $470
Fair Value $441
Bear $247Bull $737

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co · Information Technology

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Linde · Materials

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co trades at ¥33.64 versus a fair value of ¥16.80 (-50%), while Linde trades at $470 versus $441 (-6%).

Linde has the higher quality score (70/100).

Open Linde live analysis →
Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co · Linde

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Linde

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.