EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co vs Linde: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co (688116) and Linde (LIN) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co trades at ¥33.50 versus a fair value of ¥12.29 (-63%), while Linde trades at $490 versus $222 (-55%).
Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co
688116.SHG · CNY · Information Technology
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥33.50
Fair Value¥12.29
Quality38/100
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
-55%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$490
Fair Value$222
Quality70/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Jiangsu Cnano Technology CoLinde
Valuation
66.0×P/E (TTM)34.1×
11.54×P/S (TTM)6.95×
3.90×P/B6.30×
36.5×EV/EBITDA18.9×
PEG2.18×
0.2%Dividend yield1.2%
¥0.08Dividend per share$6.10
Profitability
18%Net margin20%
22%Operating margin28%
7%Return on equity18%
3%Return on assets7%
Growth
-6%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
3.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
30.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
Balance & size
0.30×Debt / equity0.54×
$2BMarket cap$241B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Linde leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Coof which business quality 39 · market factors 26 Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
51
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
22
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
26
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
68
69
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
22
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
55
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
20
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
52
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
55
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co

DCF Models¥7.44
Earnings-Based¥9.81
Dividend Discount¥3.69
Multiples¥11.77
Asset-Based¥6.92
Economic Profit¥7.37
Growth Earnings¥14.36

17 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Linde

DCF Models$211
Earnings-Based$132
Dividend Discount$116
Multiples$239
Asset-Based$55.42
Growth DCF$155
Economic Profit$156
Growth Earnings$204

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co
Bear ¥8.91Fair Value ¥12.29Bull ¥15.68
¥33.50 = current price (white tick)
Linde
Bear $121Fair Value $222Bull $291
$490 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co · Information Technology

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-63% · below median

Linde · Materials

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-55% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Jiangsu Cnano Technology Co trades at ¥33.50 versus a fair value of ¥12.29 (-63%), while Linde trades at $490 versus $222 (-55%).

Linde has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.