EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A vs Abbott Laboratories: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A (688273) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥31.25 versus a fair value of ¥18.78 (-40%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A
688273.SHG · CNY · Health Care
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥31.25
Fair Value¥18.78
Quality58/100
Abbott Laboratories
ABT · USD · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$108
Fair Value$74.79
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. AAbbott Laboratories
Valuation
46.3×P/E (TTM)27.7×
9.77×P/S (TTM)3.89×
3.00×P/B3.36×
36.9×EV/EBITDA15.1×
—PEG1.47×
2.0%Dividend yield—
¥0.80Dividend per share—
Profitability
21%Net margin14%
24%Operating margin13%
6%Return on equity12%
3%Return on assets6%
Growth
-16%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
4.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.5%
5.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.1%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.19×
$598MMarket cap$175B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Abbott Laboratories leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Aof which business quality 59 · market factors 34 Abbott Laboratoriesof which business quality 66 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
45
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
37
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
32
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
80
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
63
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
27
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A

DCF Models¥10.28
Earnings-Based¥16.63
Dividend Discount¥10.33
Multiples¥21.85
Asset-Based¥9.01
Economic Profit¥14.61
Growth Earnings¥18.78

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Abbott Laboratories

DCF Models$73.01
Earnings-Based$29.42
Dividend Discount$39.73
Multiples$70.72
Asset-Based$20.05
Growth DCF$67.02
Economic Profit$37.49
Growth Earnings$70.25

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A
Bear ¥13.15Fair Value ¥18.78Bull ¥25.89
¥31.25 = current price (white tick)
Abbott Laboratories
Bear $51.84Fair Value $74.79Bull $94.43
$108 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A · Health Care

Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-40% · below median

Abbott Laboratories · Health Care

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥31.25 versus a fair value of ¥18.78 (-40%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).

Abbott Laboratories has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →
Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A · Abbott Laboratories

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co. Ltd. A

Eli Lilly and vs UnitedHealth GroupJohnson & Johnson vs UnitedHealth GroupAbbVie vs UnitedHealth GroupUnitedHealth Group vs Merck & Company

Related to Abbott Laboratories

UnitedHealth Group vs Abbott LaboratoriesUnitedHealth Group vs AstraZenecaUnitedHealth Group vs Thermo Fisher ScientificUnitedHealth Group vs Amgen
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.