EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A vs GE Aerospace: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A (688552) and GE Aerospace (GE) compare, as of Sep 28, 2026.

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GE Aerospace as the less overvalued of the two: Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥29.86 versus a fair value of ¥3.03 (−89.9%), while GE Aerospace trades at $327 versus $92.61 (−71.7%).
Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A
688552.SHG · CNY · Industrials
−89.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥29.86
Fair Value¥3.03
Quality40/100
GE Aerospace
GE · USD · Industrials
−71.7%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$327
Fair Value$92.61
Quality73/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. AGE Aerospace
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)38.4×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)33.8×
2.96×P/S (TTM)6.77×
0.58×P/B18.37×
n/aEV/EBITDA30.4×
n/aPEG4.06×
−89.9%Fair value upside−71.7%
0.1%Dividend yield0.5%
¥0.03Dividend per share$1.66
Profitability
-20.2%Operating margin20.6%
0.00×EBIT margin trend (5Y)38.20×
-1.1%Return on equity48.2%
-1.3%Return on assets5.1%
Growth
-84.7%Revenue growth (YoY)21.1%
-5.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)n/a
−28.7%Value creation/yr+15.5%
Balance & size
22.9×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)10.4×
n/aDebt / equity1.01×
$2BMarket cap$343B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

GE Aerospace leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. Aof which business quality 44 · market factors 31 GE Aerospaceof which business quality 67 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
17
54
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
91
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
2
63
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
15
99
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
47
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
24
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
23
47
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
40
98

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. APrice ¥29.86GE AerospacePrice $327
DCF Modelsn/a−66.7%below the price$109
Earnings-Based−88.5%below the price¥3.43−77.5%below the price$73.53
Dividend Discount−95.9%below the price¥1.24−95.1%below the price$15.99
Multiples−88.7%below the price¥3.37−68.3%below the price$104
Asset-Based−82.8%below the price¥5.14−96.3%below the price$12.06
Growth DCFn/a−70.8%below the price$95.67
Economic Profit−84.3%below the price¥4.69−80.2%below the price$64.61
Growth Earnings−89.9%below the price¥3.03−59.3%below the price$133
Minimum−95.9%below the price¥1.24−96.3%below the price$12.06
Maximum−82.8%below the price¥5.14−59.3%below the price$133
Median−88.6%below the price¥3.40−74.1%below the price$84.60
Geometric mean−89.3%below the price¥3.18−82.2%below the price$58.22

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

GE Aerospace: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A
Price ¥29.86
Fair Value ¥3.03
Bear ¥2.12Bull ¥3.94
GE Aerospace
Price $327
Fair Value $92.61
Bear $67.75Bull $138

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A · Industrials

Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−89.9% · bottom 25%

GE Aerospace · Industrials

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−71.7% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GE Aerospace as the less overvalued of the two: Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥29.86 versus a fair value of ¥3.03 (−89.9%), while GE Aerospace trades at $327 versus $92.61 (−71.7%).

GE Aerospace has the higher quality score (73/100).

Open GE Aerospace live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.