EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Aurum Pacific China Group vs SAP: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Aurum Pacific China Group (8148) and SAP (SAP) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SAP as the less overvalued of the two: Aurum Pacific China Group trades at HK$3.40 versus a fair value of HK$0.29 (−91.5%), while SAP trades at €187 versus €172 (−7.6%).
Aurum Pacific China Group
8148.HK · HKD · Information Technology
−91.5%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$3.40
Fair ValueHK$0.29
Quality52/100
SAP
SAP.XETRA · EUR · Information Technology
−7.6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price€187
Fair Value€172
Quality82/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Aurum Pacific China GroupSAP
Valuation
188.0×P/E (TTM)28.0×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)22.3×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)31.0×
18.22×P/S (TTM)5.66×
21.82×P/B4.83×
n/aEV/EBITDA18.1×
n/aPEG1.63×
−91.5%Fair value upside−7.6%
n/aDividend yield1.3%
n/aDividend per share€2.50
Profitability
16.0%Operating margin27.6%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.16×
17.9%Return on equity18.3%
7.1%Return on assets9.5%
Growth
-2.4%Revenue growth (YoY)9.4%
64.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.0%
35.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
n/aValue creation/yr−1.3%
Balance & size
85.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.5×
n/aDebt / equity0.09×
$220MMarket cap$245B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
SAP, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2025 ex one-offs: 31.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

SAP leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Aurum Pacific China Groupof which business quality 52 · market factors 55 SAPof which business quality 79 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
55
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
73
76
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
80
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
97
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
24
60
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
56
59
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
88
33
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
50
92

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAurum Pacific China GroupPrice HK$3.40SAPPrice €187
DCF Models−82.1%below the priceHK$0.61−8.3%close to the price€171
Earnings-Based−77.4%below the priceHK$0.77−66.2%below the price€63.09
Dividend Discountn/a−75.9%below the price€45.06
Multiples−83.5%below the priceHK$0.56−20.4%below the price€149
Asset-Based−96.5%below the priceHK$0.12−86.1%below the price€25.98
Growth DCFn/a−20.0%below the price€149
Economic Profit−92.2%below the priceHK$0.27−60.3%below the price€74.18
Growth Earnings−67.1%below the priceHK$1.12−15.5%below the price€158
Minimum−96.5%below the priceHK$0.12−86.1%below the price€25.98
Maximum−67.1%below the priceHK$1.12−8.3%close to the price€171
Median−82.8%below the priceHK$0.59−40.4%below the price€111
Geometric mean−86.5%below the priceHK$0.46−53.4%below the price€87.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Aurum Pacific China Group: 15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

SAP: 23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Aurum Pacific China Group
Price HK$3.40
Fair Value HK$0.29
Bear HK$0.25Bull HK$0.38
SAP
Price €187
Fair Value €172
Bear €110Bull €222

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Aurum Pacific China Group · Information Technology

Quality score52 · below median
Fair value upside−91.5% · bottom 25%

SAP · Information Technology

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−7.6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SAP as the less overvalued of the two: Aurum Pacific China Group trades at HK$3.40 versus a fair value of HK$0.29 (−91.5%), while SAP trades at €187 versus €172 (−7.6%).

SAP has the higher quality score (82/100).

Open SAP live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.