EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Gameone Holdings vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Gameone Holdings (8282) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Gameone Holdings trades at HK$0.61 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (-65%), while NetEase trades at $125 versus $172 (+37%).
Gameone Holdings
8282.HK · HKD · Communication Services
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.61
Fair ValueHK$0.21
Quality46/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$125
Fair Value$172
Quality81/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Gameone HoldingsNetEase
Valuation
25.5×P/E (TTM)16.9×
0.04×P/S (TTM)4.98×
0.10×P/B3.55×
EV/EBITDA12.9×
PEG1.45×
Dividend yield2.3%
Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
1%Net margin30%
-1%Operating margin41%
2%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets11%
Growth
243%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
2.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
13.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.00×
$4MMarket cap$85B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

NetEase leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Gameone Holdingsof which business quality 50 · market factors 29 NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
34
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
82
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
81
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
28
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Gameone Holdings

Earnings-BasedHK$0.22
MultiplesHK$0.32
Asset-BasedHK$0.42
Economic ProfitHK$0.33
Growth EarningsHK$0.22

13 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

NetEase

DCF Models$1,935
Earnings-Based$1,296
Dividend Discount$370
Multiples$835
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,772
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,703

0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Gameone Holdings
Bear HK$0.16Fair Value HK$0.21Bull HK$0.26
HK$0.61 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $129Fair Value $172Bull $282
$125 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Gameone Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%

NetEase · Communication Services

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+37% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Gameone Holdings trades at HK$0.61 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (-65%), while NetEase trades at $125 versus $172 (+37%).

NetEase has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.