EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tonking New Energy Group Holdings vs China Yangtze Power Co: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tonking New Energy Group Holdings (8326) and China Yangtze Power Co (600900) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: Tonking New Energy Group Holdings trades at HK$0.15 versus a fair value of HK$0.13 (-14%), while China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.10 versus ¥25.13 (-11%).
Tonking New Energy Group Holdings
8326.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-14%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.15
Fair ValueHK$0.13
Quality39/100
China Yangtze Power Co
600900.SHG · CNY · Utilities
-11%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥28.10
Fair Value¥25.13
Quality57/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Tonking New Energy Group HoldingsChina Yangtze Power Co
Valuation
14.0×P/E (TTM)19.4×
0.06×P/S (TTM)7.84×
0.06×P/B2.94×
EV/EBITDA13.1×
0.9%Dividend yield3.6%
Dividend per share¥1.00
Profitability
2%Net margin41%
2%Operating margin49%
2%Return on equity16%
2%Return on assets5%
Growth
-67%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-19.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.4%
12.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.16×Debt / equity0.87×
$21MMarket cap$102B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive

China Yangtze Power Co leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tonking New Energy Group Holdingsof which business quality 44 · market factors 42 China Yangtze Power Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 67
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
22
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
21
28
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
79
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
60
36
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
55
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
71
100
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
60
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
16
69

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Tonking New Energy Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$0.42
Earnings-BasedHK$0.09
Dividend DiscountHK$0.02
MultiplesHK$0.17
Asset-BasedHK$0.22
Growth DCFHK$0.49
Economic ProfitHK$0.16
Growth EarningsHK$0.09

11 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

China Yangtze Power Co

DCF Models¥26.40
Earnings-Based¥17.18
Dividend Discount¥26.19
Multiples¥17.26
Asset-Based¥6.38
Growth DCF¥22.39
Economic Profit¥10.45
Growth Earnings¥24.89

21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Tonking New Energy Group Holdings
Bear HK$0.08Fair Value HK$0.13Bull HK$0.14
HK$0.15 = current price (white tick)
China Yangtze Power Co
Bear ¥16.47Fair Value ¥25.13Bull ¥31.42
¥28.10 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tonking New Energy Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score39 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-14% · below median

China Yangtze Power Co · Utilities

Quality score57 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-11% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: Tonking New Energy Group Holdings trades at HK$0.15 versus a fair value of HK$0.13 (-14%), while China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.10 versus ¥25.13 (-11%).

China Yangtze Power Co has the higher quality score (57/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.