STOCK COMPARISON
SK Target Group vs Crh Plc: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how SK Target Group (8427) and Crh Plc (CRH) compare, as of Aug 6, 2026.
As of Aug 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Crh Plc as the less overvalued of the two: SK Target Group trades at HK$4.29 versus a fair value of HK$0.48 (-89%), while Crh Plc trades at $100 versus $70.57 (-29%).
SK Target Group
8427.HK · HKD · Information Technology
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$4.29
Fair ValueHK$0.48
Quality31/100
Crh Plc
CRH · USD · Materials
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$100
Fair Value$70.57
Quality54/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
SK Target GroupCrh Plc
Valuation
89.3×P/E (TTM)19.1×
0.32×P/S (TTM)1.81×
0.30×P/B2.86×
3.9×EV/EBITDA10.7×
—PEG2.05×
—Dividend yield1.5%
—Dividend per share$1.50
Profitability
0%Net margin10%
8%Operating margin-0%
1%Return on equity16%
2%Return on assets6%
Growth
22%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
14.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.2%
6.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.7%
Balance & size
0.15×Debt / equity0.69×
$11MMarket cap$69B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
SK Target Group leads: 7 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
SK Target Groupof which business quality 44 · market factors 15
Crh Plcof which business quality 59 · market factors 38
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
23
48
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
43
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
56
49
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
77
60
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
58
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
54
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
30
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
99
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
SK Target Group
DCF ModelsHK$2.48
Earnings-BasedHK$0.31
MultiplesHK$1.11
Asset-BasedHK$3.13
Growth DCFHK$2.65
Economic ProfitHK$1.46
Growth EarningsHK$0.17
20 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.
Crh Plc
DCF Models$85.16
Earnings-Based$47.77
Dividend Discount$26.07
Multiples$103
Asset-Based$24.07
Growth DCF$73.84
Economic Profit$55.66
Growth Earnings$103
19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
SK Target Group
Bear HK$0.41Fair Value HK$0.48Bull HK$0.54
HK$4.29 = current price (white tick)
Crh Plc
Bear $35.94Fair Value $70.57Bull $117
$100 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
SK Target Group · Information Technology
Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%
Crh Plc · Materials
Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-29% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Crh Plc as the less overvalued of the two: SK Target Group trades at HK$4.29 versus a fair value of HK$0.48 (-89%), while Crh Plc trades at $100 versus $70.57 (-29%).
Crh Plc has the higher quality score (54/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
