EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Fameglow Holdings vs Alibaba Group Holding: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Fameglow Holdings (8603) and Alibaba Group Holding (9988) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alibaba Group Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Fameglow Holdings trades at HK$21.78 versus a fair value of HK$11.13 (-49%), while Alibaba Group Holding trades at HK$117 versus HK$132 (+13%).
Fameglow Holdings
8603.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$21.78
Fair ValueHK$11.13
Quality61/100
Alibaba Group Holding
9988.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+13%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$117
Fair ValueHK$132
Quality54/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Fameglow HoldingsAlibaba Group Holding
Valuation
311.1×P/E (TTM)17.1×
19.86×P/S (TTM)2.03×
P/B1.96×
EV/EBITDA19.4×
PEG0.47×
Dividend yield6.2%
Dividend per shareHK$7.24
Profitability
9%Net margin10%
13%Operating margin1%
35%Return on equity9%
10%Return on assets2%
Growth
15%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
37.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.6%
48.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.4%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.22×
$1BMarket cap$264B
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive

Fameglow Holdings leads: 6 to 3 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Fameglow Holdingsof which business quality 63 · market factors 85 Alibaba Group Holdingof which business quality 52 · market factors 39
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
79
41
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
35
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
55
13
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
88
67
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
16
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
28
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
99
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
77
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Fameglow Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$2.61
Earnings-BasedHK$2.34
MultiplesHK$1.24
Asset-BasedHK$0.17
Growth DCFHK$1.74
Economic ProfitHK$0.98
Growth EarningsHK$3.10

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Alibaba Group Holding

DCF ModelsHK$45.27
Earnings-BasedHK$176
Dividend DiscountHK$33.60
MultiplesHK$63.91
Asset-BasedHK$36.94
Economic ProfitHK$34.95
Growth EarningsHK$237

12 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Fameglow Holdings
Bear HK$8.31Fair Value HK$11.13Bull HK$31.59
HK$21.78 = current price (white tick)
Alibaba Group Holding
Bear HK$97.02Fair Value HK$132Bull HK$167
HK$117 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Fameglow Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-49% · below median

Alibaba Group Holding · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside+13% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alibaba Group Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Fameglow Holdings trades at HK$21.78 versus a fair value of HK$11.13 (-49%), while Alibaba Group Holding trades at HK$117 versus HK$132 (+13%).

Fameglow Holdings has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.