Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Almo (ALMO) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Aug 21, 2026.
As of Aug 21, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Almo trades at ILS 24.00 versus a fair value of ILS 2.78 (-88%), while New York Times trades at $65.30 versus $41.95 (-36%).
Almo
ALMO.TA · ILA · Communication Services
-88%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 24.00
Fair ValueILS 2.78
Quality44/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$65.30
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
AlmoNew York Times
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)27.9×
0.09×P/S (TTM)4.24×
1.12×P/B5.96×
3.3×EV/EBITDA22.3×
—PEG3.79×
—Dividend yield1.2%
—Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
-22%Net margin13%
0%Operating margin13%
-228%Return on equity20%
0%Return on assets10%
Growth
-26%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
502.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
206.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
0.98×Debt / equity—
$13MMarket cap$12B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Almoof which business quality 47 · market factors 34New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
37
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
96
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
38
38
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
11
43
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
—
87
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Almo
DCF ModelsILS 5.34
Earnings-BasedILS 0.75
Dividend DiscountILS 17.35
MultiplesILS 2.78
Asset-BasedILS 0.30
Growth DCFILS 5.03
Economic ProfitILS 1.15
15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
New York Times
DCF Models$43.20
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.11
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$35.48
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Almo
Bear ILS 2.00Fair Value ILS 2.78Bull ILS 3.56
ILS 24.00 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$65.30 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Almo · Communication Services
Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-88% · bottom 25%
New York Times · Communication Services
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 21, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Almo trades at ILS 24.00 versus a fair value of ILS 2.78 (-88%), while New York Times trades at $65.30 versus $41.95 (-36%).
New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
