EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Baker Hughes vs Schlumberger: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Baker Hughes (BKR) and Schlumberger (SLB) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Baker Hughes as the less overvalued of the two: Baker Hughes trades at $64.63 versus a fair value of $32.40 (-50%), while Schlumberger trades at $57.41 versus $28.66 (-50%).
Baker Hughes
BKR · USD · Energy
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$64.63
Fair Value$32.40
Quality59/100
Schlumberger
SLB · USD · Energy
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$57.41
Fair Value$28.66
Quality52/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Baker HughesSchlumberger
Valuation
17.9×P/E (TTM)20.7×
1.99×P/S (TTM)1.96×
2.95×P/B2.69×
11.9×EV/EBITDA10.3×
2.25×PEG1.62×
−49.9%Fair value upside−50.1%
1.4%Dividend yield2.0%
$0.92Dividend per share$1.15
Profitability
12%Operating margin12%
4.00×EBIT margin trend (5Y)
17%Return on equity14%
5%Return on assets6%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
9.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.3%
6.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.6%
+63.9%Value creation/yr+15.9%
Balance & size
16.0×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.8×
0.29×Debt / equity0.37×
$56BMarket cap$70B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed

Schlumberger leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Baker Hughesof which business quality 59 · market factors 66 Schlumbergerof which business quality 54 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
42
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
34
18
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
55
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
71
67
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
69
58
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
63
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
58
68
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
82
98
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
84
58

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyBaker HughesPrice $64.63SchlumbergerPrice $57.41
DCF Models-45%below the price$35.50-37%below the price$35.98
Earnings-Based-47%below the price$34.16-62%below the price$21.58
Dividend Discount-77%below the price$14.98-68%below the price$18.13
Multiples-48%below the price$33.86-48%below the price$30.02
Asset-Based-80%below the price$12.72-80%below the price$11.70
Growth DCF-42%below the price$37.20-29%below the price$40.81
Economic Profit-53%below the price$30.69-52%below the price$27.29
Growth Earnings-51%below the price$31.83-50%below the price$28.48
Minimum-80%below the price$12.72-80%below the price$11.70
Maximum-42%below the price$37.20-29%below the price$40.81
Median-49%below the price$32.84-51%below the price$27.88
Geometric mean-58%below the price$27.02-56%below the price$25.08

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Baker Hughes: 25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Schlumberger: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Baker Hughes
Bear $22.71Fair Value $32.40Bull $41.36
$64.63 = current price (white tick)
Schlumberger
Bear $21.17Fair Value $28.66Bull $36.48
$57.41 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Baker Hughes · Energy

Quality score59 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Schlumberger · Energy

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Baker Hughes as the less overvalued of the two: Baker Hughes trades at $64.63 versus a fair value of $32.40 (-50%), while Schlumberger trades at $57.41 versus $28.66 (-50%).

Baker Hughes has the higher quality score (59/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.