STOCK COMPARISON
Ccvtf vs Veralto: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ccvtf (CCVTF) and Veralto (VLTO) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ccvtf as the less overvalued of the two: Ccvtf trades at $1.17 versus a fair value of $1.05 (-10%), while Veralto trades at $98.34 versus $69.11 (-30%).
Ccvtf
CCVTF · USD · Industrials
-10%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1.17
Fair Value$1.05
Quality48/100
Veralto
VLTO · USD · Industrials
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$98.34
Fair Value$69.11
Quality71/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
CcvtfVeralto
Valuation
7.3×P/E (TTM)23.7×
—P/S (TTM)4.00×
—P/B7.20×
—EV/EBITDA16.2×
—PEG2.70×
—Dividend yield0.5%
$0.36Dividend per share$0.48
Profitability
34%Net margin17%
20%Operating margin24%
5%Return on equity36%
1%Return on assets11%
Growth
10%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-6.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.2%
3.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.8%
Balance & size
0.50×Debt / equity0.64×
$2BMarket cap$22B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Veralto leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Ccvtfof which business quality 46 · market factors 58
Veraltoof which business quality 70 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
43
36
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
29
73
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
55
72
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
74
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
67
44
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
98
77
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Ccvtf
DCF Models$5.20
Earnings-Based$11.59
Dividend Discount$5.82
Multiples$7.12
Asset-Based$18.48
Economic Profit$20.32
Growth Earnings$20.55
1 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.
Veralto
DCF Models$65.58
Earnings-Based$47.47
Dividend Discount$6.75
Multiples$64.44
Asset-Based$8.47
Growth DCF$56.57
Economic Profit$46.75
Growth Earnings$65.88
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Ccvtf
Bear $1.05Fair Value $1.05Bull $2.12
$1.17 = current price (white tick)
Veralto
Bear $46.91Fair Value $69.11Bull $87.04
$98.34 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Ccvtf · Industrials
Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-10% · above median
Veralto · Industrials
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-30% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ccvtf as the less overvalued of the two: Ccvtf trades at $1.17 versus a fair value of $1.05 (-10%), while Veralto trades at $98.34 versus $69.11 (-30%).
Veralto has the higher quality score (71/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.