EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cohance Lifesciences vs Merck KGaA: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cohance Lifesciences (COHANCE) and Merck KGaA (MRK) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Merck KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Cohance Lifesciences trades at ₹451 versus a fair value of ₹149 (−66.9%), while Merck KGaA trades at €134 versus €109 (−19.0%).
Cohance Lifesciences
COHANCE.NSE · INR · Healthcare
−66.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹451
Fair Value₹149
Quality31/100
Merck KGaA
MRK.XETRA · EUR · Health Care
−19.0%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€134
Fair Value€109
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Cohance LifesciencesMerck KGaA
Valuation
161.5×P/E (TTM)24.6×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)15.1×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, reported earnings)25.0×
7.94×P/S (TTM)2.84×
4.35×P/B2.10×
53.6×EV/EBITDA12.1×
n/aPEG2.15×
−66.9%Fair value upside−19.0%
n/aDividend yield1.6%
n/aDividend per share€2.20
Profitability
-11.5%Operating margin13.9%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.07×
3.8%Return on equity8.1%
2.7%Return on assets4.7%
Growth
-23.1%Revenue growth (YoY)3.4%
19.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-1.7%
17.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.8%
−19.9%Value creation/yr+7.2%
Balance & size
6.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)15.5×
0.01×Debt / equity0.36×
$2BMarket cap$68B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed
Merck KGaA, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings: 25.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Merck KGaA leads: 3 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cohance Lifesciencesof which business quality 39 · market factors 42 Merck KGaAof which business quality 61 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
30
41
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
40
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
50
57
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
80
75
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
19
80
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
58
75
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
14
62
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyCohance LifesciencesPrice ₹451Merck KGaAPrice €134
DCF Models−72.4%below the price₹125−20.3%below the price€107
Earnings-Based−79.1%below the price₹94.53−60.4%below the price€53.25
Dividend Discountn/a−69.7%below the price€40.71
Multiples−79.5%below the price₹92.37−12.1%close to the price€118
Asset-Based−84.8%below the price₹68.49−67.2%below the price€44.06
Growth DCF−77.4%below the price₹102−29.7%below the price€94.57
Economic Profit−87.3%below the price₹57.43−50.6%below the price€66.44
Growth Earnings−70.8%below the price₹132−14.3%close to the price€115
Minimum−87.3%below the price₹57.43−69.7%below the price€40.71
Maximum−70.8%below the price₹132−12.1%close to the price€118
Median−79.1%below the price₹94.53−40.1%below the price€80.50
Geometric mean−79.5%below the price₹92.41−45.1%below the price€73.75

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Cohance Lifesciences: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Merck KGaA: 23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Cohance Lifesciences
Price ₹451
Fair Value ₹149
Bear ₹86.82Bull ₹190
Merck KGaA
Price €134
Fair Value €109
Bear €60.04Bull €150

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cohance Lifesciences · Healthcare

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−66.9% · bottom 25%

Merck KGaA · Health Care

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside−19.0% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Merck KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Cohance Lifesciences trades at ₹451 versus a fair value of ₹149 (−66.9%), while Merck KGaA trades at €134 versus €109 (−19.0%).

Merck KGaA has the higher quality score (62/100).

Open Merck KGaA live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.