EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Comet Holding vs Keysight Technologies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Comet Holding (COTN) and Keysight Technologies (KEYS) compare, as of Sep 28, 2026.

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Keysight Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Comet Holding trades at CHF 356 versus a fair value of CHF 38.25 (−89.3%), while Keysight Technologies trades at $362 versus $116 (−67.9%).
Comet Holding
COTN.SW · CHF · Information Technology
−89.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceCHF 356
Fair ValueCHF 38.25
Quality57/100
Keysight Technologies
KEYS · USD · Information Technology
−67.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$362
Fair Value$116
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Comet HoldingKeysight Technologies
Valuation
226.8×P/E (TTM)48.5×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)26.1×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)31.3×
8.09×P/S (TTM)9.52×
11.97×P/B10.66×
92.2×EV/EBITDA37.3×
1.45×PEG0.70×
−89.3%Fair value upside−67.9%
0.1%Dividend yieldn/a
CHF 0.50Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
6.3%Operating margin25.7%
0.53×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.97×
3.9%Return on equity20.9%
3.0%Return on assets7.2%
Growth
-10.2%Revenue growth (YoY)36.5%
-8.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.3%
2.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.0%
−15.0%Value creation/yr+8.9%
Balance & size
7.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.9×
n/aDebt / equity0.43×
$4BMarket cap$63B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Keysight Technologies, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 6 of the years ex one-offs: 31.3.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Keysight Technologies leads: 1 to 13 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Comet Holdingof which business quality 57 · market factors 57 Keysight Technologiesof which business quality 69 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
41
52
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
23
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
42
89
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
80
76
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
87
59
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
9
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
72
79
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
84
97
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
87

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyComet HoldingPrice CHF 356Keysight TechnologiesPrice $362
DCF Models−87.6%below the priceCHF 44.22−66.8%below the price$120
Earnings-Based−94.9%below the priceCHF 18.33−89.8%below the price$36.83
Dividend Discount−93.3%below the priceCHF 23.96n/a
Multiples−87.8%below the priceCHF 43.33−73.1%below the price$97.34
Asset-Based−92.5%below the priceCHF 26.62−93.6%below the price$23.13
Growth DCF−90.2%below the priceCHF 35.10−69.8%below the price$109
Economic Profit−92.2%below the priceCHF 27.65−87.4%below the price$45.53
Growth Earnings−89.3%below the priceCHF 38.25−67.5%below the price$118
Minimum−94.9%below the priceCHF 18.33−93.6%below the price$23.13
Maximum−87.6%below the priceCHF 44.22−66.8%below the price$120
Median−91.2%below the priceCHF 31.38−73.1%below the price$97.34
Geometric mean−91.3%below the priceCHF 30.90−81.6%below the price$66.65

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Comet Holding: 25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Keysight Technologies: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Comet Holding
Price CHF 356
Fair Value CHF 38.25
Bear CHF 27.80Bull CHF 49.73
Keysight Technologies
Price $362
Fair Value $116
Bear $75.42Bull $153

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Comet Holding · Information Technology

Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside−89.3% · bottom 25%

Keysight Technologies · Information Technology

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−67.9% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Keysight Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Comet Holding trades at CHF 356 versus a fair value of CHF 38.25 (−89.3%), while Keysight Technologies trades at $362 versus $116 (−67.9%).

Keysight Technologies has the higher quality score (70/100).

Open Keysight Technologies live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.