EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cisco Systems vs Rapac Communication & Infrastructure: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cisco Systems (CSCO) and Rapac Communication & Infrastructure (RPAC) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the more attractively valued of the two: Cisco Systems trades at $106 versus a fair value of $117 (+10%), while Rapac Communication & Infrastructure trades at ILS 70.75 versus ILS 15.80 (-78%).
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
+10%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$106
Fair Value$117
Quality74/100
Rapac Communication & Infrastructure
RPAC.TA · ILA · Industrials
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 70.75
Fair ValueILS 15.80
Quality31/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Cisco SystemsRapac Communication & Infrastructure
Valuation
35.5×P/E (TTM)126.3×
7.87×P/S (TTM)0.59×
10.21× · book value is mostly goodwillP/B0.84×
29.0×EV/EBITDA14.4×
1.68×PEGn/a
+10.0%Fair value upside−77.7%
1.6%Dividend yieldn/a
$1.65Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
25%Operating margin2%
0.75×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.39×
25%Return on equity2%
7%Return on assets1%
Growth
12%Revenue growth (YoY)14%
3.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.6%
2.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-2.9%
+1.7%Value creation/yr+7.4%
Balance & size
7.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)1.3×
0.49×Debt / equity0.27×
$478BMarket cap$484M
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Cisco Systems leads: 7 to 3 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 70 Rapac Communication & Infrastructureof which business quality 31 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
58
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
8
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
85
4
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
64
39
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
75
51
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
59
77
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
72
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
82
56
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
97
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyCisco SystemsPrice $106Rapac Communication & InfrastructurePrice ILS 70.75
DCF Models-32%below the price$72.20n/a
Earnings-Based-76%below the price$25.45-81%below the priceILS 13.24
Dividend Discount-71%below the price$31.20-100%below the priceILS 0.04
Multiples-50%below the price$53.39-71%below the priceILS 20.63
Asset-Based-93%below the price$7.96-65%below the priceILS 25.01
Growth DCF-41%below the price$62.97n/a
Economic Profit-73%below the price$28.50-73%below the priceILS 19.41
Growth Earnings-52%below the price$50.63-78%below the priceILS 15.80
Minimum-93%below the price$7.96-100%below the priceILS 0.04
Maximum-32%below the price$72.20-65%below the priceILS 25.01
Median-62%below the price$40.91-75%below the priceILS 17.60
Geometric mean-67%below the price$34.92-91%below the priceILS 6.61

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Cisco Systems: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Rapac Communication & Infrastructure: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Cisco Systems
Price $106
Fair Value $117
Bear $79.50Bull $149
Rapac Communication & Infrastructure
Price ILS 70.75
Fair Value ILS 15.80
Bear ILS 11.06Bull ILS 20.54

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cisco Systems · Information Technology

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+10% · above median

Rapac Communication & Infrastructure · Industrials

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the more attractively valued of the two: Cisco Systems trades at $106 versus a fair value of $117 (+10%), while Rapac Communication & Infrastructure trades at ILS 70.75 versus ILS 15.80 (-78%).

Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).

Open Cisco Systems live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.