Eureka Forbes vs Midea Group Co: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Eureka Forbes (EUREKAFORB) and Midea Group Co (000333) compare, as of Aug 13, 2026.
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Eureka Forbes trades at ₹459 versus a fair value of ₹169 (-63%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥84.34 versus ¥107 (+27%).
Eureka Forbes
EUREKAFORB.NSE · INR · Consumer Cyclical
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹459
Fair Value₹169
Quality63/100
Midea Group Co
000333.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
+27%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥84.34
Fair Value¥107
Quality53/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Eureka ForbesMidea Group Co
Valuation
54.8×P/E (TTM)14.2×
3.26×P/S (TTM)1.37×
1.92×P/B2.81×
28.4×EV/EBITDA10.6×
—PEG3.00×
—Dividend yield5.3%
—Dividend per share¥4.30
Profitability
6%Net margin10%
10%Operating margin11%
4%Return on equity18%
2%Return on assets5%
Growth
12%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
9.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.0%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.0%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.07×
$928MMarket cap$93B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Midea Group Co leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Eureka Forbesof which business quality 62 · market factors 40Midea Group Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 73
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
52
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
63
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
85
51
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
82
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
17
79
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
77
29
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Eureka Forbes
DCF Models₹318
Earnings-Based₹264
Multiples₹177
Asset-Based₹159
Growth DCF₹300
Economic Profit₹150
Growth Earnings₹347
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Midea Group Co
DCF Models¥157
Earnings-Based¥82.49
Multiples¥106
Asset-Based¥21.46
Growth DCF¥144
Economic Profit¥77.14
Growth Earnings¥129
6 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Eureka Forbes
Bear ₹127Fair Value ₹169Bull ₹211
₹459 = current price (white tick)
Midea Group Co
Bear ¥80.41Fair Value ¥107Bull ¥168
¥84.34 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Eureka Forbes · Consumer Cyclical
Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-63% · bottom 25%
Midea Group Co · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside+27% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Eureka Forbes trades at ₹459 versus a fair value of ₹169 (-63%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥84.34 versus ¥107 (+27%).
Eureka Forbes has the higher quality score (63/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
