EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Garo AB vs Itochu: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Garo AB (GARO) and Itochu (ITOCHU19) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Itochu as the more attractively valued of the two: Garo AB trades at SEK 13.06 versus a fair value of SEK 6.57 (-50%), while Itochu trades at THB 7.20 versus THB 14.40 (+100%).
Garo AB
GARO.ST · SEK · Industrials
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 13.06
Fair ValueSEK 6.57
Quality57/100
Itochu
ITOCHU19.BK · THB · Industrials
+100%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceTHB 7.20
Fair ValueTHB 14.40
Quality55/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Garo ABItochu
Valuation
P/E (TTM)16.0×
0.06×P/S (TTM)0.96×
0.11×P/B2.20×
1.2×EV/EBITDA18.1×
PEG2.46×
Profitability
-3%Net margin6%
-5%Operating margin5%
-7%Return on equity14%
2%Return on assets3%
Growth
-7%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-9.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.1%
0.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)
Balance & size
0.03×Debt / equity0.44×
$59MMarket cap$91B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Itochu leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Garo ABof which business quality 56 · market factors 23 Itochuof which business quality 53 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
20
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
32
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
53
47
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
61
44
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
32
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
10
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
95

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Garo AB

DCF ModelsSEK 12.25
MultiplesSEK 12.69
Asset-BasedSEK 7.09
Growth DCFSEK 13.12

8 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

Itochu

DCF ModelsTHB 32.07
Earnings-BasedTHB 24.60
MultiplesTHB 40.79
Asset-BasedTHB 10.53
Growth DCFTHB 21.65
Economic ProfitTHB 19.72

0 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Garo AB
Bear SEK 3.73Fair Value SEK 6.57Bull SEK 9.41
SEK 13.06 = current price (white tick)
Itochu
Bear THB 9.14Fair Value THB 14.40Bull THB 21.81
THB 7.20 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Garo AB · Industrials

Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Itochu · Industrials

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside+100% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Itochu as the more attractively valued of the two: Garo AB trades at SEK 13.06 versus a fair value of SEK 6.57 (-50%), while Itochu trades at THB 7.20 versus THB 14.40 (+100%).

Garo AB has the higher quality score (57/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.