Hammer Metals vs Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hammer Metals (HMX) and Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA (FRE) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Hammer Metals trades at A$0.08 versus a fair value of A$0.04 (-48%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Hammer Metals
HMX.AU · AUD · Materials
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$0.08
Fair ValueA$0.04
Quality37/100
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
FRE.XETRA · EUR · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€46.91
Fair Value€32.15
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Hammer MetalsFresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)15.6×
—P/S (TTM)1.18×
1.19×P/B1.42×
—EV/EBITDA11.5×
3.34×PEG0.77×
—Dividend yield2.5%
—Dividend per share€1.05
Profitability
0%Net margin6%
—Operating margin10%
-6%Return on equity8%
-4%Return on assets3%
Growth
53%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
1.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.4%
18.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-8.8%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.48×
$40MMarket cap$27B
mixedGrowth qualityweak
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA leads: 3 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Hammer Metalsof which business quality 39 · market factors 70Fresenius SE & Co. KGaAof which business quality 55 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
0
32
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
41
92
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
60
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
67
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Hammer Metals
Dividend DiscountA$0.04
Asset-BasedA$0.03
3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
DCF Models€28.71
Earnings-Based€17.93
Dividend Discount€16.93
Multiples€43.76
Asset-Based€22.73
Growth DCF€25.33
Economic Profit€23.30
Growth Earnings€39.20
21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Hammer Metals
Bear A$0.04Fair Value A$0.04Bull A$0.05
A$0.08 = current price (white tick)
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Bear €27.44Fair Value €32.15Bull €48.50
€46.91 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Hammer Metals · Materials
Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-48% · below median
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA · Health Care
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-31% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Hammer Metals trades at A$0.08 versus a fair value of A$0.04 (-48%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
