Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Konami Holdings (KNM) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 28, 2026.
As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Konami Holdings trades at £219 versus a fair value of £71.97 (-67%), while NetEase trades at $123 versus $173 (+41%).
Konami Holdings
KNM.LSE · GBP · Communication Services
-67%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£219
Fair Value£71.97
Quality74/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+41%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$123
Fair Value$173
Quality81/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Konami HoldingsNetEase
Valuation
0.3×P/E (TTM)16.9×
—P/S (TTM)4.97×
—P/B3.54×
—EV/EBITDA12.9×
2.12×PEG1.45×
1.2%Dividend yield3.4%
£222Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
20%Net margin30%
24%Operating margin41%
19%Return on equity22%
12%Return on assets11%
Growth
27%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
16.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
12.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
0.07×Debt / equity0.00×
$3.5TMarket cap$85B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
NetEase leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Konami Holdingsof which business quality 73 · market factors 58NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 46
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
66
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
74
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
40
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
53
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
54
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
70
29
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
89
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Konami Holdings
DCF Models£14,300
Earnings-Based£7,401
Dividend Discount£3,304
Multiples£14,639
Asset-Based£2,790
Growth DCF£12,899
Economic Profit£9,313
Growth Earnings£13,641
0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
NetEase
DCF Models$1,935
Earnings-Based$1,296
Dividend Discount$370
Multiples$835
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,772
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,703
0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Konami Holdings
Bear £48.88Fair Value £71.97Bull £93.33
£219 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $130Fair Value $173Bull $283
$123 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Konami Holdings · Communication Services
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-67% · bottom 25%
NetEase · Communication Services
Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+41% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Konami Holdings trades at £219 versus a fair value of £71.97 (-67%), while NetEase trades at $123 versus $173 (+41%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
