EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ledesma SAAI vs 3M: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ledesma SAAI (LEDE) and 3M (MMM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees 3M as the less overvalued of the two: Ledesma SAAI trades at ARS 766 versus a fair value of ARS 228 (-70%), while 3M trades at $168 versus $71.86 (-57%).
Ledesma SAAI
LEDE.BA · ARS · Consumer Staples
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceARS 766
Fair ValueARS 228
Quality39/100
3M
MMM · USD · Industrials
-57%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$168
Fair Value$71.86
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Ledesma SAAI3M
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)32.9×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)46.4×
n/aP/S (TTM)3.67×
n/aP/B19.52× · book value is mostly goodwill
2.0×EV/EBITDA15.6×
n/aPEG1.67×
−70.2%Fair value upside−57.1%
6.5%Dividend yield1.7%
n/aDividend per share$2.97
Profitability
3%Operating margin23%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.85×
-7%Return on equity71%
-1%Return on assets8%
Growth
11%Revenue growth (YoY)1%
119.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)n/a
93.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)n/a
n/aValue creation/yr−11.5%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
0.13×Debt / equity2.33×
$226MMarket cap$92B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

3M leads: 2 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ledesma SAAIof which business quality 39 · market factors 34 3Mof which business quality 56 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
14
32
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
31
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
52
37
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
28
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
69
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
22
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
53
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyLedesma SAAIPrice ARS 7663MPrice $168
DCF Modelsn/a-43%below the price$95.13
Earnings-Basedn/a-55%below the price$75.06
Dividend Discountn/a-84%below the price$27.44
Multiples-41%below the priceARS 450-49%below the price$85.72
Asset-Based-14%close to the priceARS 657-96%below the price$6.04
Growth DCFn/a-68%below the price$53.39
Economic Profitn/a-52%below the price$80.57
Minimum-41%below the priceARS 450-96%below the price$6.04
Maximum-14%close to the priceARS 657-43%below the price$95.13
Median-28%below the priceARS 553-55%below the price$75.06
Geometric mean-29%below the priceARS 543-73%below the price$46.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Ledesma SAAI: 2 of 2 models see the stock below the current price.

3M: 12 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Ledesma SAAI
Price ARS 766
Fair Value ARS 228
Bear ARS 87.98Bull ARS 368
3M
Price $168
Fair Value $71.86
Bear $43.30Bull $102

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ledesma SAAI · Consumer Staples

Quality score39 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%

3M · Industrials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-57% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees 3M as the less overvalued of the two: Ledesma SAAI trades at ARS 766 versus a fair value of ARS 228 (-70%), while 3M trades at $168 versus $71.86 (-57%).

3M has the higher quality score (62/100).

Open 3M live analysis →
Ledesma SAAI · 3M

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Ledesma SAAI

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to 3M

Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron TechnologyAdvanced Micro Devices vs Microsoft
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.