Medartis Holding vs Abbott Laboratories: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Medartis Holding (MED) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Medartis Holding trades at CHF 84.50 versus a fair value of CHF 13.99 (-83%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
Medartis Holding
MED.SW · CHF · Health Care
-83%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceCHF 84.50
Fair ValueCHF 13.99
Quality48/100
Abbott Laboratories
ABT · USD · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$108
Fair Value$74.79
Quality67/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Medartis HoldingAbbott Laboratories
Valuation
135.4×P/E (TTM)27.7×
5.19×P/S (TTM)3.89×
5.06×P/B3.36×
75.4×EV/EBITDA15.1×
—PEG1.47×
Profitability
3%Net margin14%
-4%Operating margin13%
3%Return on equity12%
0%Return on assets6%
Growth
29%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
13.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.5%
16.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.1%
Balance & size
0.41×Debt / equity0.19×
$1BMarket cap$175B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Abbott Laboratories leads: 3 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Medartis Holdingof which business quality 50 · market factors 47Abbott Laboratoriesof which business quality 66 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
34
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
57
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
45
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
46
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
45
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
72
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Medartis Holding
DCF ModelsCHF 9.20
Earnings-BasedCHF 9.14
MultiplesCHF 13.08
Asset-BasedCHF 14.85
Growth DCFCHF 6.94
Economic ProfitCHF 14.29
Growth EarningsCHF 14.10
18 of 18 models see the stock below the current price.
Abbott Laboratories
DCF Models$73.01
Earnings-Based$29.42
Dividend Discount$39.73
Multiples$70.72
Asset-Based$20.05
Growth DCF$67.02
Economic Profit$37.49
Growth Earnings$70.25
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Medartis Holding
Bear CHF 11.07Fair Value CHF 13.99Bull CHF 18.12
CHF 84.50 = current price (white tick)
Abbott Laboratories
Bear $51.84Fair Value $74.79Bull $94.43
$108 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Medartis Holding · Health Care
Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-83% · bottom 25%
Abbott Laboratories · Health Care
Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Medartis Holding trades at CHF 84.50 versus a fair value of CHF 13.99 (-83%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
Abbott Laboratories has the higher quality score (67/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
